Extinction Rebellion: a capitalist scam to hijack our resistance

 

Special report

xr-logo

[UPDATE. WEDNESDAY APRIL 24 2019. FOLLOWING WIDESPREAD GRASSROOTS DISQUIET OVER THE XR BUSINESS WEBSITE, IT HAS BEEN TAKEN DOWN. WHAT THIS MEANS FOR XR AND ITS POSITION ON CAPITALISM IS NOT YET CLEAR. WE WILL PUBLISH FURTHER REPORTS AS INFORMATION COMES IN]

When Extinction Rebellion first burst into action in the UK last November, it felt as if something was finally going to change.

Their high-profile arrival on the political scene had a noticeable effect on awareness of environmental issues and gave people permission to speak more freely than before about our society and its relationship to nature.

Yes, there were many criticisms of XR tactics and language from the likes of the new Green Anti-Capitalist Front and activist Emily Apple.

But when this month’s big week of action in London got underway, with Waterloo Bridge and Oxford Circus blocked and Marble Arch occupied, it felt as if something important and radical was happening.

And perhaps it was, because, presumably, the vast majority of those who turned out, including the nearly 1,000 who were arrested, genuinely believe that our civilization needs to change course if life on this earth is to survive.

But the integrity of XR as an organisation was dealt a fatal blow on Easter Monday, when its Twitter account started plugging links to a new website called XR Business, which had been announced in a letter to The Times.

Among the signatories was Gail Bradbrook, director and shareholder of Compassionate Revolution Ltd and Holding Group member of XR. This is just not some separate support group, but an intrinsic part of the XR apparatus.

The very existence of the site was bad enough, but the home page was (and is) hideous. A corporate satellite view of Europe lit up like a Christmas tree. What sort of environmental movement would choose such imagery?

We should have seen this coming. We had, after all, already read investigative journalist Cory Morningstar’s excellent digging into the “climate change” industry on her Wrong Kind of Green blog.

But somehow we wanted to give XR the benefit of the doubt and even naively plugged the London protests in our last bulletin.

The XR Business site, however, is a declaration of Rebellion Extinction. This is now officially an ex-Rebellion, shorn of all pretence of radicalism.

Instead, what we find is a list of “business leaders” who have identified environmental catastrophe as yet another get-rich opportunity.

And they are prepared to hijack and exploit people’s real love for life and nature in order to push their profiteering agenda.

First name on the list of these so-called “leaders” is Seb Beloe, partner at WHEB. WHEB describes itself as “a positive impact investor focused on the opportunities created by the transition to a low carbon and sustainable global economy”.

It adds: “We focus on nine sustainable investment themes with strong growth characteristics, derived from providing solutions to major social and environmental challenges”.

On a page headed “thought leadership” WHEB announces that it is “actively involved” in organisations “at the leading edge of sustainable and responsible investment”.

These include the Global Impact Investing Network, which explains in turn on its website that it brings together “impact investors and intermediaries who have the capacity to invest and intervene at scale, making multi-million dollar investments and aggregating funds large enough to access institutional capital” […]

via Rebellion Extinction: a capitalist scam to hijack our resistance

9 thoughts on “Extinction Rebellion: a capitalist scam to hijack our resistance

  1. A process as old as mankind, why revolutions never succeed, never accomplish the hopes and dreams of their instigators. The only working alternative that cannot be hijacked is self empowerment.

    Like

  2. This surprises me. However, conservative environmentalists (like Republic.en) still believe the free market is the answer to climate change. And James Hansen recently criticized the Green New Deal, stressing the importance of a carbon tax. (I don’t see why the GND can’t include a stiff carbon tax.)

    Like

  3. Does feel like the left tearing down the left again. Do you think the right would worry about this? No, they’d power on. No wonder the left keeps losing. Occupy, yellow vests, competing women’s marches etc. are examples of where this bickering shatters the unified power of a movement.

    Like

  4. Peter, I’m not sure if you read the full article or if you understand what an astroturf campaign is. An astroturf campaign is a campaign run by and for corporations to increase their profits. Most of the leftists I know are opposed to the immense power corporations exert over our so-called democratic power structures. I’m not sure why they would willingly work to increase the profits of corporations directing multi-million dollar investments in the opportunity presented by environmental catastrophe. Of course the right would power on in a similar situation – they’re overwhelming pro-corporate.

    Like

    • Understand AstroTurfing and greenwashing etc. and get your concerns. But at what point is winning more important than the picking apart the methodology? If all corportates are excluded, isn’t your support base reduce early on? I keep watching the left losing (heck I was conceived the week of RFK’s GDP speech, born the week of Nixon’s victory) all my life. And I want a balance of ideas and power, but don’t see it happening any time soon. In part that is because the left doesn’t work, as far as I see it, with what they can get. Nobody is pure as snow, but perhaps forming a more effective coalition (even if it comes with worts) is more important than seeking perfection. Maybe.

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.