The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act

UK Warnings About Threats to Food Security


Fair Deal Food

As fuel and fertiliser costs soar, farmers get only a tiny share of the retail price for their produce

VIDEO: Egg shortage due to unfair supermarket prices – not avian flu: Farmers Guardian, subscribers only

Farmers Weekly reports that food and farming groups are dismayed at the wafer-thin margins left for primary producers once everyone else in the food chain has taken their share of the cash.

A new report from food and farming alliance Sustain, Unpicking Food Prices has considered a range of products commonly found on supermarket shelves and examined where the available profit goes.

Two examples: a pack of four beefburgers with a retail value of £3.50 only returns a net profit of 8.7p, the researchers estimate, while a block of Cheddar cheese, worth £2.50, generates just 3.5p in profit.

While average retail prices have risen from £2.05/kg in 2017 to £2.20/kg in 2022, farmgate returns have slumped from 60p/kg to 40p/kg over the same five-year period

But the lion’s share is kept by the retailer with farmers left to pick up the crumbs – just 0.1p from the burgers and 0.05p from the Cheddar cheese.

Head of sustainable farming at Sustain, Vicki Hird, says this demonstrates the imbalance in the food supply chain “Farmers hold a disproportionately high amount of the risk when it comes to producing food, but receive a disproportionately low amount of the reward, reflecting their relative weakness in the supply chain.”

Ms Hird should contact Baroness Eliza Manningham-Buller, former chief of MI5 the country’s security service, who says that security of food supplies would fit within the government’s own definition of national security. She believed this meant strengthening domestic supply (FT):

“Several people [have] said that [food security] was about just getting a secure food line from somewhere else . . . I’ve interpreted it differently.

“We have a hope that we will continue to get food from our nearest neighbours as we get energy from them . . . The more we can be self-sufficient, the better chances we have of withstanding price hikes, spikes, shocks and so on — and politics.”

The NFU today focussed only on the price of inputs and the need to import labour but they, the government and the former chief of MI5 need to become aware of the risk to food security posed by low returns from supermarkets as farmers’ costs soar.




Florida to Hold Vaccine Makers Liable Over mRNA Claims

Posted BY: Bill | NwoReport

Gov. Ron DeSantis said Florida wants to hold vaccine makers liable over claims about the mRNA shots that DeSantis said aren’t true.

DeSantis made the announcement during a Republican Party of Florida event on Saturday, according to American Greatness.

While the federal government has given vaccine manufacturers immunity over harm from the Covid-19 shots, it appears Florida is looking into persecuting the makers over false advertising claims or through other similar avenues.

“We did a study in Florida and we saw an 86 percent increase in cardiac-related activity in people ages 18 to 39 from mRNA shots and so we’re going to be doing some stuff to bring accountability there,” DeSantis said, according to AG.

The study likely involved Florida’s Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, whom DeSantis said he was keeping for his second term.

Dr. Ladapo, a frequent target in the media despite his Harvard education, has been skeptical about the efficacy of Covid-19 shots.

“His evidence-based principles serve as a counterweight to the increasingly political positions of the entrenched medical establishment, especially on schools, masks, and mRNA shots,” DeSantis once said about Ladapo.

In fact, the recently-released deposition of Dr. Anthony Fauci reveals the medical establishment’s own flip-flopping when it came to mask mandates, for example, which indicates the media attacks against Ladapo are motivated by politics more than anything.



Scientists Struggle to Explain Why Covid Spared Unjabbed

scientists explain why covid spared unjabbed

Dr Mercola

 Story at-a-glance

  • “Vaccine equity” remains high on the global cabal’s list of priorities, even though real-world evidence shows the COVID shots have done more harm than good
  • Africa, where fewer than 6% of people have received the COVID jab, have maintained an extremely low COVID-19 death rate throughout the last three years, likely because they didn’t have equal access to experimental COVID injections
  • While wholly ignoring the African experience, U.S. media are now trying to scare people into taking additional shots for fall by warning of an incoming “tripledemic” of COVID, flu and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)
  • The tripledemic narrative is scientifically implausible. Respiratory viruses tend to interfere with each other’s spread, such that one typically ends up dominating
  • Pfizer’s and Moderna’s pediatric trials both found RSV infection was more prevalent among children who got their COVID jabs than those who didn’t

The globalist cabal that invented and drove the make-believe COVID narrative is facing growing problems, as holes in the logic just keep getting larger over time. Case in point: The irrational promotion of vaccine equity.1

According to the World Health Organization and other globalist strongholds, the Western world must sponsor vaccine deliveries to developing nations to make sure everyone has an equal chance at survival.2

The problem is that developing nations with the lowest COVID jab uptakes have fared no worse, and in some cases far better, than developing countries that greedily “hoarded” shots and boosters for themselves.

The African Conundrum

According to early predictions, Africa would be decimated by COVID for lack of shots,3 yet the COVID death toll in Africa has remained consistently lower than anywhere else over the past three years. Everyone feigns surprise.


The situation was still the same in November 2021, when media reported that Africa, where fewer than 6% of people had received a COVID shot, was among the countries least affected by COVID. Researchers theorized that “lower rates of urbanization, genetic reasons or exposure to other diseases may have spared the continent the more lethal effects of the virus.”7

No one in mainstream media has been willing to address any of the towering elephants in the room, which include the fact that the COVID shots don’t prevent cases or deaths, that natural immunity is superior, and that COVID-19 was never as lethal a threat as they said it was. Africa gives us real-world evidence of these facts, yet the globalist cabal still insist that “vaccine equity” is an imperative goal.

Even though places like Africa didn’t have adequate access to COVID shots, and even though they fared just as well or better than the Western world where COVID shot uptake was high, the cabal insist we still need to make sure that, next time, Africa will get the same kind of injection coverage as the rest of the world.

This makes no sense, especially when you consider that the majority of COVID deaths in the U.S. and elsewhere now occur among those who got the COVID jabs.8


New Wave of Fear-Porn to Drive Vaccination Uptake

While wholly ignoring the African experience, U.S. media are now trying to scare people into taking additional shots for fall by warning of an incoming “tripledemic” of COVID, flu and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). As fear of COVID variants is wearing off, perhaps fear of three simultaneous viral threats will re-stoke the flames of paranoia? As reported by STAT News November 22, 2022:10

“A viral hurricane is making landfall on health care systems battered by three pandemic years. With the official start of winter still weeks away, pediatric hospitals are facing crushing caseloads of children sick with RSV and other viral illnesses.

Schools that promised a ‘return to normal’ now report widespread absences and even closures from RSV and flu in many parts of the country, contributing to parents missing work in record numbers.

With this year’s flu season beginning some six weeks early, the CDC has already declared a flu epidemic as hospitalizations for influenza soared to the highest point in more than a decade. A storm of these proportions should demand not only crisis clinical measures, but also community prevention efforts.”

In other words, expect renewed calls for masks, social distancing, lockdowns and the canceling of holiday get-togethers where people might share wrongthink and love for humanity in equal measure. And, of course, expect massive COVID booster and flu shot campaigns, and shaming of those who decide to abstain.

The Problem With the Tripledemic Narrative

The problem with the tripledemic narrative is that it’s scientifically implausible. Those with little or no understanding of how viruses work might fall into the trap of thinking that if one virus is bad, two or three circulating at the same time will be far worse. But it’s not that linear in real life.

In a November 18, 2022, Science magazine article, Jon Cohen explained why a simultaneous tripledemic is unlikely:11

“Triple threat. Tripledemic. A viral perfect storm. These frightening phrases have dominated recent headlines as some health officials, clinicians, and scientists forecast that SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) could surge at the same time in Northern Hemisphere locales that have relaxed masking, social distancing, and other COVID-19 precautions.

But a growing body of epidemiological and laboratory evidence offers some reassurance: SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses often ‘interfere’ with each other.

Although waves of each virus may stress emergency rooms and intensive care units, the small clique of researchers who study these viral collisions say there is little chance the trio will peak together and collectively crash hospital systems the way COVID-19 did at the pandemic’s start.

‘Flu and other respiratory viruses and SARS-CoV-2 just don’t get along very well together,’ says virologist Richard Webby, an influenza researcher at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. ‘It’s unlikely that they will circulate widely at the same time.


COVID Shots Likely Responsible for Soaring RSV Rates in Kids

In related news, evidence suggests RSV didn’t soar out of season for no reason. In fact, it appears to be a result of the pediatric COVID jab campaign. Documents from Pfizer’s and Moderna’s pediatric trials submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration reveal the injected group suffered higher rates of RSV, specifically, compared to controls.

Moderna’s trial involving 2- to 5-year-olds found RSV was four times more prevalent among children in the jabbed group compared to the unjabbed:13


The same pattern was found in the 6- to 11-year-old trial, where RSV affected 0.3% of those who got the jab, and zero percent among controls. Children who got the jab were also more likely to contract some kind of upper respiratory tract infection (3.9% compared to 2.5%).

Pfizer’s pediatric trial had similar results. Among 6-month-olds to 4-year-olds, RSV bronchiolitis was reported in five participants, compared to three in the control group. Is the U.S. Centers for Disease Control investigating this pattern? We’ll see.



The Trumpification of Elon Musk
Real Clear Politics

The relentless attacks on Elon Musk since he purchased Twitter should be familiar to most Americans. It’s exactly what Democrats and their media and corporate allies did to demonize Donald Trump.

The McCarthyite formula is simple: Claim you are defending high-minded principles (Democracy! The rule of law! Civil discourse!) to justify efforts to delegitimize someone you’ve identified as a political opponent.

Democrats denied Trump’s presidency from day one; Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden themselves declared for years that he had stolen the 2016 election. In the name of election integrity, Democrats turned a bogus conspiracy theory cooked up by Clinton’s campaign about Russian collusion into years of official investigations that undermined and tainted Trump. When Special Counsel Robert Mueller proved that a lie, Democrats immediately seized on a few innocuous sentences in a Trump phone call with a foreign leader to launch just the third presidential impeachment in U.S. history.

Those events are well-known, but ponder them for a moment. This was a soft coup, a nonviolent version of Jan. 6 that was far more dangerous than the Capitol riot. The effort to remove a lawfully elected president was planned and orchestrated by officials at the highest level of government and the media. While Jan. 6 was a one-off eruption of crazed anger, the false attacks on Trump edged our political discourse toward Orwellian Newspeak by presenting lies and smears as ringing defenses of sacred constitutional values.

The ongoing attacks against Musk are following the same playbook. The man once hailed by liberals as a genius for developing electric vehicles is now Public Enemy No. 1 because he says Twitter should allow more free speech. Ponder that as well: Musk’s enemies are casting him as a threat to the country because of his commitment to one of America’s most cherished freedoms.

Progressives have abandoned their longstanding anti-corporate stance to argue that an unelected, unaccountable company must aggressively censor the vox populi. We saw the same dizzying turnabout in Russiagate, where the left abandoned its historic defense of Russia to cast dealings with that nation as un-American (making Joe McCarthy their new “Uncle Joe”). 

Yes, Musk has restored Donald Trump’s Twitter account which the company’s previous leaders had disabled when he was president. But there is zilch, zero, nada evidence at this point that Twitter has become a toxic cesspool of hate. Nevertheless, that is the bogus claim being advanced by thought leaders including Jelani Cobb, dean of Columbia University’s journalism school.

Ponder the argument here that a corporation should have the power to remove the president of the United States from communicating through one of the nation’s prime networks. The same people who cheered that decision also thought it was appropriate for Twitter to help swing the 2020 election by prohibiting users from sharing blockbuster reports about Hunter Biden’s foreign dealings, recorded on his laptop.


The attacks on Musk shed light on a darker mystery of American life: Why did liberals attack Trump so savagely? Yes, Trump is a coarse, combative man who has the same relationship with truth as a used-car salesman. But that hardly makes him an outlier in our coarse, combative culture where, the left has long argued, truth and almost everything else we used to define as reality are just social constructs.

At bottom, they saw Trump – and now Musk – as a threat to their power and privilege. For all their talk of democracy and the will of the people, liberals have always embraced a top-down approach in which a benighted few control society. Trump was the first president without political or military experience. He  was not just an outsider; he  also promised to expose the hypocrisy and self-dealing of the ruling class, both Democrats and Republicans (hence the rise of “Never Trump” Republicans).

The fact that this man with no political experience accomplished so much – including helping the economy hum, brokering a peace deal in the Middle East, calling out China’s ruthlessness, and creating conditions for the development of a COVID vaccine in record time – exposed the failures of our best and brightest. He wasn’t a threat to the nation, but to their authority.

Liberals see Musk as a similar threat. For decades they have largely controlled the flow of information in prestige publications and network news divisions. The rise of social media gave them new mechanisms for defining national narratives, and for silencing those who disagreed with them through cancel culture and outright censorship. They see Musk’s promise to restore free speech on Twitter as a threat to this power. Whoopi Goldberg stated this baldly when she counseled liberals to walk away from Twitter until they figure out how to “get the control you need” of the platform.



GOP Congress Members to Military: Drop the Covid “Caccine” Mandate or No More Defense Funding

Drop the covid “vaccine” mandate or no more defense funding, say GOP members of Congress to military

Dr Eddy Betterman

There may not be enough Senate votes to pass the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) this year unless every branch of the United States military stops forcing servicemembers to get “vaccinated” for covid.

Thirteen Senate Republicans, including Rand Paul of Kentucky and Rick Scott of Florida, have pledged to vote against this year’s installment of the NDAA unless the military’s covid jab mandate is immediately repealed.

A veteran himself, Scott tweeted that in the past he “fought hard for big [national] security wins in the NDAA,” but that this year he will not vote to move the bill forward unless the Department of Defense (DoD) stops tyrannizing military servicemembers with its covid jab mandate.

“I think on the NDAA one thing that’s going to be important is that we don’t give cloture unless they agree that we’re not going to keep kicking people out of the service for their – if they’re unvaccinated,” Scott added in a statement to Fox News.

“I think that we’ve got to start standing up for people.”

In a letter to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Scott and the other 12 senators wrote that the DoD’s jab mandate has “ruined the livelihoods of men and women who have honorably served our country.”

“While the Department of Defense certainly must make decisions that will bolster military readiness, the effects of the mandate are antithetical to readiness of our force, and the policy must be revoked,” that same letter further reads.

Paul added in his own tweet that he, too, will oppose the NDAA this year “unless the Senate votes on an amendment to prohibit discharges from the Armed Forces solely because of vaccination status.”

That same amendment would also reinstate service members who were discharged for not getting jabbed, as well as issue them back pay for the entirety of their time off the ranks. […]


Isolation and Cold War Conflict: Korea and Vietnam

Syngman Rhee | Images of Old Hawaiʻi

US Puppet Dictator Syngman Rhee

Episode 46: Cold War Conflicts: Korea and Vietnam

Foundations of Eastern Civilization

Dr Craig Benjamin (2013)

Film Review

By 1950 half the world’s population was under Communist rule.

The Sino-Soviet split (1960-1989) related in part to ideological differences[1] and in part to Chinese pique that 1) the Soviets sided with India over Tibet and 2) their foreign aid to non-communist nations like India and Egypt exceeded that to China.

The first Chinese atomic bomb test in 1964 greatly increased Cold War tensions.

The fifties witnessed the first of numerous proxy wars between the US and Soviet Union: the Korean War (1950-53). Following Japan’s surrender, (in a move opposed by the majority of Koreans) the US and Soviet Union divided the newly independent Korea [2] at the 38th parallel and became temporary “trustees. ” Unable to agree on a framework for nationwide elections, the Americans engineered the “election” of notorious puppet dictator Syngman Rhee in May 1948, and declared South Korea as “The Republic of Korea.”[3]

North Korea held their own elections in August 1948 for the first Constitutional Assembly of the Peoples Democratic Republic of North Korea. The Assembly chose anti-Japanese Korean resistance fighter Kim Il-Sung as premier.

In what North Koreans have always viewed as a war of liberation against US occupation of Korea, the North Koreans invaded South Korea on June 25, 1950. Within a few weeks they controlled nearly nearly the entire peninsula. In response the US, with UN backing, deployed their own troops. After the latter drove North Korean forces back above the 38th parallel, China entered the war. After Chinese-backed North Korean forces seized Seoul for the second time, the US/UN forces again drove them north and the war became a virtual stalemate. The Korean War ultimately killed two million Korean troops and civilians and 36,000 US troops.

Benjamin also gives an extremely brief overview of the Vietnam War, which like the Korean War, arose out of the Vietnamese independence movement.[4] Following the Japanese surrender the Viet Minh, the primary resistance fighters against Japanese occupation, immediately proclaimed Vietnam independence from France. When French troops re-occupied in November 1946, the Viet Minh fired on a French warship in Haiphong Harbor. The subsequent French massacre of 6,000 Vietnamese civilians triggered a Viet Minh guerrilla war against France.

Initially the war was a stalemate (1947-49), until Chinese troops assisted in driving the French out of northern Vietnam. From 1952 on, the US financed the French war against the Chinese-backed Viet Minh. In 1954, the French surrendered and the peace treaty signed in Geneva temporarily (pending nationwide elections) divided Vietnam at the 17th parallel.

Unwilling to hold Vietnam-wide elections (they knew North Vietnamese leader Ho Chi Minh would win), in 1955 the US appointed puppet dictator Ngo Dinh to run South Vietnam. From 1957-on, he faced a growing South-Vietnamese based insurgency, known as the Viet Cong. The inability of the South Vietnamese army to crush the insurgency led to the growing presence of CIA and US military advisors in South Vietnam. In 1965 President Lyndon Johnson sent the first (mostly drafted) troop divisions to South Vietnam .

The ten-year war resulted in the death of 3-4 million Vietnamese, 2 million Laotians and Cambodians [5} and 58,159 US troops.

[1] Mao proclaimed the Soviets’ pursuit of “peaceful co-existence” as “revisionist,” while Khrushchev declared the Chinese “dangerous leftist adventurers.

[2] Korea had been occupied by Japan since 1910 (see 19th Century Korea: Resisting European Colonization to Fall Victim to Japan )

[3] Although Benjamin erroneously refers to the 1948 Republic of Korea as a pro-Western democratic state, the late Chalmers Johnson has thoroughly documented that Korea was under US military occupation (South Korean troops were under US military command) until 1994 (when a mass uprising overthrew the last US puppet dictator). The Korean people fought for decades to expel the US military, despite their mass protests and demonstrations being violently suppressed by the US-run Korean military. See The Long US War Against the Third World

[4] Prior to World War II, Laos, Vietnam and Cambodia were also French colonies.

[5] Owing to brutal US carpet bombing of Laos and Cambodia.

Film can be viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.

German Nurse Walks Free After Injecting Almost 10,000 Patients With Saline Instead of COVID Jab

Posted BY: Jasmine | NwoReport

Unsung hero nurse received 6 months probation and had her nursing license revoked.

A Red Cross nurse who injected 8,600 elderly patients with saline solution instead of the experimental COVID jab has walked free from court with only 6 months probation.

39-year-old Antje T. administered the saltwater solution “vaccines” at the Schortens jab center in Friesland, Germany, telling patients they were the Pfizer jab.

Antje T. jabbed up to 8,600 mostly over 70 patients who were mainly hospital employees, educators and doctors between March 5 and April 2021.

She reportedly shared her skepticism about the COVID jab’s safety and effectiveness on social media.

“The accused had shared various conspiracy theories on the Internet and on social media,” said court spokesperson Torben Toelle.

“However, the chamber could not determine with the necessary certainty that this set of ideas was the motive for her actions and that she then acted to sabotage a vaccination campaign.”

Police say she was able to make the switch from the real jabs to the saline because she was in charge of vaccine and syringe preparation during her shift.

She was reported to authorities after a colleague noticed she had used the saline solution on six patients in April 2021.


Ultimately, she was found guilty of six counts of intentional assault on November 30.

As many on social media noted, Antje T. should be awarded a medal instead of having her license revoked for saving thousands of people’s lives given the dangerous and experimental nature of the mRNA injection.



Peoples Health Alliance Launches Road Map for 2023

By Roger Guttridge


‘2023 will be an incredible year in many ways, but for PHA it is about helping to return healthcare power and choice back to the people and to build systems across all communities to support the continued development of true health solutions for all.’

Watch Roger Guttridge’s interview with the PHA’s Katherine Macbean on HTL’s Odysee channel

The People’s Health Alliance have published their Road Map for 2023 following seven months of extraordinary progress since their launch in April.

Their plans are designed to kick-start a number of national projects as well as secure funding for the growing number of community health hub groups that are aiming to open their doors to the public in the near future.

PHA projects for 2023 include:

• a 24-hour Mental Wellbeing helpline;

• a pilot model for community Youth Hubs;

• the development of medical NHS Transition programmes, including regional clinics;

• the provision of membership models to ensure everyone can access a PHA Health Hub regardless of their financial situation;

In addition, the PHA will continue to develop their Directory of Practitioners as well as focusing on their Education Division, Care Division and continued work with many partners and affiliates.

‘We are the first to acknowledge that we do not have all the answers but we believe that collaboration with authentic and aligned groups and organisations will ensure that together we will find the solutions,’ said PHA spokesperson Katherine Macbean.

‘The PHA core team will be looking to develop relationships with potential donors in December to ensure the implementation of key projects, as well as supporting hub groups, and to start building a social care pot for those who need it.

‘Due to the continued challenges we all face in accessing the NHS, PHA cannot take its foot off the gas.

‘2023 will be an incredible year in many ways, but for PHA it is about helping to return healthcare power and choice back to the people and to build systems across all communities to support the continued development of true health solutions for all.’

Ms Macbean said PHA’s basic vision and aims were clear from the start.

‘As the government pushed vaccine mandates for the NHS, many of us knew it would disrupt access to healthcare even further, and potentially lead to an exodus of much-needed healthcare workers,’ she said.

‘In recent years our ability to access the NHS, particularly our GP services, has become increasingly difficult, and the arrival of Covid made this even worse.

‘The founding of the People’s Health Alliance took six months of basic planning and the gathering of dozens of incredibly proactive volunteers, all making sacrifices and working tirelessly, ensuring the launch of PHA in April 2022 as an organic, people-led initiative.

‘Hundreds of members of the general public quickly realised the enormous potential for PHA to bring its model of an integrated health support initiative to the communities of the UK.

‘It became clear that now is a critical time to create a safety net of PHA health hubs.’

The ultimate vision regarding PHA health hubs is to have a hub in every village, town and district in the country, each run by a community of local volunteers and experienced practitioners.

A mix of holistic and allopathic practitioners would combine to make their various healing approaches available to everyone while at the same time encouraging everyone to take greater personal responsibility towards their own health.

‘This was never going to be a walk in the park,’ said Ms Macbean.

‘However, seven months after launching, PHA boasts seven physical PHA Health Hubs, 14 interactive PHA Health Hubs open, dozens more planned and 30 countries across the world now adopting the PHA model and working hard to open their doors to support their communities.

‘Through sheer hard work and determination, these incredible achievements have been reached with barely any budget and no support from government and conglomerates. This was, and always will be, about sheer people power.’

She added: ‘PHA’s motto is By the People, For the People, and we aim to fulfil that in the most practical and solution-based way. The time to get involved – and be part of something vital – is now.’

For more information, visit the website

Reach Peoples Health Alliance New Zealand via their Telegram link:


Watch Roger Guttridge’s interview with the PHA’s Katherine Macbean on HTL’s Odysee channel

Lied suddenly: the Deep State death spiral

Martin Geddes

Can you see the most important story in the whole world right now in the screenshot above from the BBC News website? Look closely! You will need a keen eye.

Sorry, it is a trick question. The story is not there. Children getting ill from sore throats isn’t the biggest issue facing humanity this weekend.

How about on the tech news page?

Nope. Not there, either!

What about the page on the US and Canada?

Also absent. Hmm…

Most of us recognise that the BBC isn’t involved in journalism. It simply offers cover for criminals as a propaganda and social engineering enterprise. If the BBC blacks out a major story, you know it must be really threatening to the power base that the establishment represents. The same applies to CNN, the Washington Post, MSNBC, and the whole of the rest of the controlled corporate media, with few exceptions. (The Daily Telegraph in the UK seems to have had a mutiny and started reporting truth, and the Daily Mail isn’t doing so badly either. Maybe the writing is on the wall… reform now or die.)

The biggest story in the world right now is the delegitimisation of the (fraudulent, illegitimate, staged, fake, and bankrupt) Biden regime. Last night Elon Musk (who may be a stage character or a real person) introduced journalist Matt Taibbi (a really real person AFAICT) to offer us The Twitter Files.

Musk gave Taibbi the authority to share a “tier zero” megascandal, much bigger than Watergate. This isn’t “conspiracy theory” any longer when it comes from an official and credible source. Our fundamental freedoms are under threat, and it demonstrates corruption at the highest levels.

The US government (in collusion with members of both established parties) has been caught acting like communist China to erase your First Amendment free speech rights. This is part of an attempt to overthrow the Constitution and install a puppet government only answerable to foreign Globalist interests.

Specifically, Twitter has been covering up the Hunter Biden laptop story (for no legitimate reason). This was done at the behest of agents in the Democratic National Committee as well as government officials at the FBI. This is election interference and is illegal; when done on behalf of foreign entities it is treason and punishable by death. Tied to the proven lies around “Russian collusion” and the “dirty dossier” it is enough to justify the erasure of the FBI as an institution and the complete restructuring of the Department of Justice. This is a coup conducted via treacherous internal forces, which is the most dangerous kind. The consequences are extremely severe, both geopolitical and economic.

The undoing of the 2020 election (which was a giant sting op as part of a continuity of government plan) will result in tens to hundreds of thousands of indictments. What is important to understand is how everything is connected into one giant web of dark power. Criminals have business plans, form alliances, and see no boundaries to their activities. Mafias are not limited to narcotics, prostitution, smuggling, extortion, and murder for hire. They can also control media empires, pharmaceutical companies, banking networks, telecoms companies, technology brands, and much more. In particular they can covertly own our legal system and politicians, making the trafficking of all humans as debt slaves seem lawful.

The blackout of this story by the mass media makes them further criminally complicit, and gives sufficient reason for their removal by military force. Over the coming week we can expect more revelations of Big Tech and Legacy Media working together to keep the public uninformed of organised crime by those in power. (I have personally been on large demonstrations in London that were not properly reported upon, so I know this suppression is real thing.) The US Supreme Court is due to meet on Friday, and may well “drop the bomb” and remove from office everyone involved in the certification of the 2020 election (and more). That would certainly justify the “storm is upon us” tweet!

Once you see the media is lying to you (by omission) about one story, you naturally become curious about what else they are hiding. The Balenciaga scandal is written up very well by Liz Crokin here, including links to the Clinton Foundation and Jeffrey Epstein. The fashion industry is a slum of repulsiveness, and this is now being brought into the light. Children being put into sexualised adverts with BDSM gear isn’t “edgy”, it is sick. The accompanying Satanic symbolism and displays of “artistic” barbarity raise the most awful questions of what is really going on. Right now the media is trying to put a PR spin on the indefensible, and failing.

The critical part in Liz’s article is how the media distracts people with labels like “Pizzagate” and the largely irrelevant detail of one store’s basement, rather than the big picture of human trafficking and widespread paedophilia. FTX is also going largely unexamined in the legacy media — it being a vast money laundering engine to recycle cash from taxpayers via “foreign aid” into the pockets of corrupt politicians. All the key themes of “QAnon” (whatever that is) are being validated — which means that those who are still awakening to this nightmare are being given cause to review everything that was previously dismissed as a “baseless conspiracy theory”.

Now that Twitter is in the hands (we hope) of honourable people, in order to maintain total information control the enemy would have to shut down the whole Internet and/or launch some epic distraction like WW3. If these legacy media sites continue to ignore obvious major stories, or try to spin them, their credibility will vanish even faster. Formal questions will begin to be asked by the few remaining people in power with courage, and the public will start to vent their anger. We already see where this is heading with events in Brazil. The masses have awoken, and are lied of being lied to constantly and gaslit. This mind control game is over.

The natural next questions are…

  • What other stories were suppressed by Twitter?

  • Who else has access to information suppression capabilties?

  • Which other platforms were involved in suppression?

  • What was the degree of coordination involved?

  • Who was pulling the strings?

  • What was the (national and political) allegiance and background of those involved?

  • Who is really funding Big Tech and these actors?

  • What other crimes were being committed by the same players? (Hint: Covid)

  • Will failure to investigate or report by the MSM result in prompt arrest as a co-conspirator?



%d bloggers like this: