Uninformed Consent: Brave New Film Documenting the Plandemic

Uninformed Consent

Matador Films

Film Review

Uninformed Consent is an in depth look into the Covid 19 narrative, who’s controlling it and how it’s being used to inject an untested, novel technology, into nearly every person on the planet. It presents the material as a collage of vignettes, alternating between mainstream media coverage and sound bites from doctors, researchers and vaccine victims speaking out for vaccine choice.

Part 1

Part 1 begins with the deliberate lies various governments have disseminated about the Covid plandemic:

1) That despite having no effect on infection and transmission, [1] vaccines would prevent the spread of Covid.

2) That the unvaccinated put the vaccinated at risk (which, given that Covid vaccines don’t prevent the spread of illness, is nonsense).

3) That natural immunity following Covid infection offers no protection against future illness (despite numerous studies showing that natural Covid infection protects against all known coronavirus variants for more than 12 months).

4) Calling Covid injections “vaccines,” when they all fail to meet the legal definition of a vaccine.[2]

5) That early treatment with the antivirals Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (used safely and effectively against a variety of infections for over 20 years) is dangerous and ineffective.[3]

The film moves on to emphasize the criminality of Big Pharma, in league with the FDA and CDC (and Biden and Fauci), of continuing to promote Covid vaccines that have already killed nearly 30,000 Americans. Even worse is the enactment of federal, state and corporate mandates (resulting in the firing of unvaccinated employees) when officials know perfectly well that none of the Covid “vaccines” prevent infection or transmission. Several researchers highlight the irony of continuing to inoculate people for a virus (the original Wuhan variant) that doesn’t exist any more.

Part 1 next delves into the longstanding conspiracy by pharmaceutical companies to destroy the careers of doctors and researchers who question vaccine safety. In addition to highlighting numerous Covid vaccine choice doctors and researchers who have been fired and blacklisted, they also the case of British gastroenterologist Dr Andrew Wakefield. The latter had his career destroyed after he published research linking the MMR vaccine to autism. He was subsequently vindicated in 2014, when CDC whistleblower Dr William Thompson revealed the CDC had falsified data in a 2002 study showing a clear link between the MMR and autism in African American boys.

Part 2

The second part begins by questioning the motivation (and possible corruption) of judges who have have refused to overturn US mandates, despite clear evidence (originating from the pharmaceutical companies themselves) that vaccinations fails to prevent workers infected with Covid passing it on to co-workers or clients and customers.

It also compares the plight of Covid whistleblowers to that of Rachel Carson when she took on the chemical industry with her 1962 book Silent Spring. At the time, nearly the entire corporate media dismissed her as “radical,” “disloyal,” “hysterical,” and/or “unscientific.”

The filmmakers also delve into the murky role of “regulatory capture” in the mass distribution and promotion of highly dangerous and clearly ineffective [4] “vaccines.” The latter derives in part from the funding the FDA and CDC receive from pharmaceutical companies (who pay to have their assessed for approval) and in part from the notorious “revolving door” system, whereby compliant FDA and CDC officials typically move into more lucrative careers with pharmaceutical companies.

Finally they examine the failure of the mainstream to question the clearly criminal behavior by Big Pharma and corrupt regulators. It becomes clear the main reason for the massive amount pharmaceutical companies spend on TV and print advertising isn’t to promote their products. With so many news outlets relying on pharmaceutical advertising to survive, Big Pharma’s true motivation is to control content.

I was intrigued to learn the Biden administration has also paid corporate media outlets over $1 billion to promote Covid vaccines.

The film concludes by talking about the Nuremberg Code, which bans the mandatory imposition of experimental treatment on anyone without their consent, and the role of the Covid plandemic in the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset.

---

[1] Drug companies have been forthright from the outset that the vaccines (allegedly) reduce the severity of Covid illness – that they don’t prevent infection or spread.

[2] See https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/4132

[3] After reviewing more than 60 studies, Dr Tess Lawrie estimate that early treatment with Ivermectin could have prevented 80% of Covid deaths in the US. Government and Big Pharma had to negate the effectiveness of existing treatments to meet the legal requirements for emergency FDA vaccine authorization.

[4] Growing evidence suggests that immune suppression caused by Covid vaccines means that vaccinated patients have more severe Covid infections and higher rates of hospitalization and death. The fact that the (so-called) effectiveness of these vaccines wears off after three months is further evidence of its ineffectiveness. No vaccine in history has every required three monthly administration.

Film can be viewed free at the following link:

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/premiere-uninformed-consent-a-matador-films-picture/

Vaxxed 2: Parents Talk Frankly About Vaccine Injuries

Vaxxed 2: The People’s Truth

Directed by Brian Burrowes (2019)

Film Review

Vaxxed 2 concerns the Vaxxed bus that toured seven countries (US, Canada, UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand) after the film Vaxxed came out in 2016. The tour was prompted by the massive response filmmakers received from parents of vaccine-injured children after their first documentary was released.

Fifteen doctors and several immunologists participated in the tour, and parents’ stories were broadcast round the world via Periscope TV. The documentary features commentary by prominent vaccine researchers Dr Suzanne Humphries, Dr Andrew Wakefield and Robert F Kennedy Jr.

For me, the most alarming segment of the film consists of interviews with a dozen teenagers who became paralyzed after taking the HPV vaccine Gardasil. Kennedy provides some really interesting background on the vaccine trials that preceded its release. The randomized controlled trials were conducted without a true placebo. Instead the manufacturer (Merck) used the neurotoxin aluminum (believed to be the cause of HPV paralysis and other neurological injuries) in the control group. Death rates (in both the control and the experimental groups) were 37 times the death rate from cervical cancer (which Gardasil is meant to prevent).

Then there were the heart wrenching stories of parents whose infants died (usually of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) after receiving MMR (measles/mumps/rubella) vaccine.* In several of these cases, child protective services opened a child abuse investigation (against the parents).

In 2014, a CDC study reported that the US (which vaccinates more infants than any other country) had the highest infant mortality of 34 industrialized countries.

When I reflect on all the chronic health problems in my family (starting with my  mother’s generation) with allergies, asthma, ear infections, eczema and digestive problems, the most discouraging part of the film featured the thousands of unvaccinated children who also came to greet the bus. The chronic health conditions that plague so many US children were totally absent in the unvaccinated kids. The effect was especially striking in families in which the eldest vaccinated child suffered constant ear infections, colds and allergies, while their younger unvaccinated siblings experienced none of these conditions.**

---

*Where parents took these cases to the federal Vaccine Court (see https://www.thevaccinecourt.com/), they received the maximum compensation of $250,000)

**A number of controlled research trials support findings that unvaccinated children are healthier. See https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2050312120925344 and https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/research-reviews/fully-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-a-summary-of-the-research/ One of the pediatricians who accompanied the tour declines to vaccinate infants under three and has no history of SIDS deaths in her practice.

Vaxxed 2 can be viewed free at https://www.bitchute.com/video/vEeZ1z2qpQag/

The Shoddy Science Behind Vaccination

Vaccine Illusion: How Vaccination Compromises our Natural Immunity and What We Can Do to Regain Our Health

Tetyana Obukhanych PhD

2012

Available free from Greenmedinfo.com

Book Review

Trained immunologist Tetyana Obukhanych offers an excellent summary of the major flaws in the current body of vaccination research. I wasn’t terribly surprised to learn the field of immunological research is contaminated by the same unscientific dogma and bias as the fields of water fluoridation and nutrition research (see The Role of Western Medicine in the Epidemic of Obesity, Diabetes and Heart Disease)

Immunological research, like these other areas, is limited by what drug companies and government agencies, such as National Institutes of Mental Health, are willing to fund. At the moment, they refuse to fund experiments that test the current theory of how vaccines work. They also refuse to fund studies on adverse vaccine effects beyond two to three weeks of administration or in the area of naturally acquired immunity.

According to Obukhanych, the limited research evidence that exists suggests that quarantine is probably more effective than vaccination and, along with improved nutrition, is likely responsible for the overall decrease in deadly infectious diseases.

No Double Blind Studies

Her book begins by explaining how tetanus vaccine works – it actually immunizes patients against the toxin produced by Clostridium tetani, rather than the infectious agent itself. The effectiveness of tetanus toxoid has never been subjective to randomized controlled trial (ie double blind study). This would be viewed as unethical as it would leave the control group unprotected against tetanus. Obukhanych mentions a 1984 study revealing Vitamin C to be an effective alternative treatment of tetanus. Vitamin C treatment could be subjected to a randomized controlled trial, but it would be unlikely to receive funding.

Despite the strong pro-vaccine bias in the research community, Obukhanych offers up a number of laboratory and animal studies that challenge the concept of “immunological memory” and other dogma doctors and public health official disseminate about vaccines. She also examines some of the research pointing to the role “adjuvants” (mostly aluminum salts) play in dangerous allergic and autoimmune responses to vaccines.

Debunking Herd Immunity

She goes on to challenge the notion (with research evidence) that vaccinating children at age one and five with the MMR offers them “herd immunity” against measles, mumps and rubella. By definition, heard immunity only exists when 68% of the population has active antibodies against a specific infection. Most serological tests show that the virus neutralizing capacity that develops in response to MMR only lasts 2-5 years. This means the vast majority of adolescents and adults are unprotected.

Even more concerning, women vaccinated against measles at age five no longer pass protection against measles through their breast milk. Obukhanych believes this explains a significant increase in measles encephalitis in infants since 1990.

Obukhanych also devotes a chapter to a detailed scientific explanation of why flu vaccine is no longer protecting patients against influenza.