Uninformed Consent
Matador Films
Film Review
Uninformed Consent is an in depth look into the Covid 19 narrative, who’s controlling it and how it’s being used to inject an untested, novel technology, into nearly every person on the planet. It presents the material as a collage of vignettes, alternating between mainstream media coverage and sound bites from doctors, researchers and vaccine victims speaking out for vaccine choice.
Part 1
Part 1 begins with the deliberate lies various governments have disseminated about the Covid plandemic:
1) That despite having no effect on infection and transmission, [1] vaccines would prevent the spread of Covid.
2) That the unvaccinated put the vaccinated at risk (which, given that Covid vaccines don’t prevent the spread of illness, is nonsense).
3) That natural immunity following Covid infection offers no protection against future illness (despite numerous studies showing that natural Covid infection protects against all known coronavirus variants for more than 12 months).
4) Calling Covid injections “vaccines,” when they all fail to meet the legal definition of a vaccine.[2]
5) That early treatment with the antivirals Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (used safely and effectively against a variety of infections for over 20 years) is dangerous and ineffective.[3]
The film moves on to emphasize the criminality of Big Pharma, in league with the FDA and CDC (and Biden and Fauci), of continuing to promote Covid vaccines that have already killed nearly 30,000 Americans. Even worse is the enactment of federal, state and corporate mandates (resulting in the firing of unvaccinated employees) when officials know perfectly well that none of the Covid “vaccines” prevent infection or transmission. Several researchers highlight the irony of continuing to inoculate people for a virus (the original Wuhan variant) that doesn’t exist any more.
Part 1 next delves into the longstanding conspiracy by pharmaceutical companies to destroy the careers of doctors and researchers who question vaccine safety. In addition to highlighting numerous Covid vaccine choice doctors and researchers who have been fired and blacklisted, they also the case of British gastroenterologist Dr Andrew Wakefield. The latter had his career destroyed after he published research linking the MMR vaccine to autism. He was subsequently vindicated in 2014, when CDC whistleblower Dr William Thompson revealed the CDC had falsified data in a 2002 study showing a clear link between the MMR and autism in African American boys.
Part 2
The second part begins by questioning the motivation (and possible corruption) of judges who have have refused to overturn US mandates, despite clear evidence (originating from the pharmaceutical companies themselves) that vaccinations fails to prevent workers infected with Covid passing it on to co-workers or clients and customers.
It also compares the plight of Covid whistleblowers to that of Rachel Carson when she took on the chemical industry with her 1962 book Silent Spring. At the time, nearly the entire corporate media dismissed her as “radical,” “disloyal,” “hysterical,” and/or “unscientific.”
The filmmakers also delve into the murky role of “regulatory capture” in the mass distribution and promotion of highly dangerous and clearly ineffective [4] “vaccines.” The latter derives in part from the funding the FDA and CDC receive from pharmaceutical companies (who pay to have their assessed for approval) and in part from the notorious “revolving door” system, whereby compliant FDA and CDC officials typically move into more lucrative careers with pharmaceutical companies.
Finally they examine the failure of the mainstream to question the clearly criminal behavior by Big Pharma and corrupt regulators. It becomes clear the main reason for the massive amount pharmaceutical companies spend on TV and print advertising isn’t to promote their products. With so many news outlets relying on pharmaceutical advertising to survive, Big Pharma’s true motivation is to control content.
I was intrigued to learn the Biden administration has also paid corporate media outlets over $1 billion to promote Covid vaccines.
The film concludes by talking about the Nuremberg Code, which bans the mandatory imposition of experimental treatment on anyone without their consent, and the role of the Covid plandemic in the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset.
[1] Drug companies have been forthright from the outset that the vaccines (allegedly) reduce the severity of Covid illness – that they don’t prevent infection or spread.
[2] See https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/4132
[3] After reviewing more than 60 studies, Dr Tess Lawrie estimate that early treatment with Ivermectin could have prevented 80% of Covid deaths in the US. Government and Big Pharma had to negate the effectiveness of existing treatments to meet the legal requirements for emergency FDA vaccine authorization.
[4] Growing evidence suggests that immune suppression caused by Covid vaccines means that vaccinated patients have more severe Covid infections and higher rates of hospitalization and death. The fact that the (so-called) effectiveness of these vaccines wears off after three months is further evidence of its ineffectiveness. No vaccine in history has every required three monthly administration.
Film can be viewed free at the following link:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/premiere-uninformed-consent-a-matador-films-picture/
The Most Revolutionary Act 