Uninformed Consent: Brave New Film Documenting the Plandemic

Uninformed Consent Bumper Stickers

Uninformed Consent

Matador Films

Film Review

Uninformed Consent is an in depth look into the Covid 19 narrative, who’s controlling it and how it’s being used to inject an untested, novel technology, into nearly every person on the planet. It presents the material as a collage of vignettes, alternating between mainstream media coverage and sound bites from doctors, researchers and vaccine victims speaking out for vaccine choice.

Part 1

Part 1 begins with the deliberate lies various governments have disseminated about the Covid plandemic:

1) That despite having no effect on infection and transmission, [1] vaccines would prevent the spread of Covid.

2) That the unvaccinated put the vaccinated at risk (which, given that Covid vaccines don’t prevent the spread of illness, is nonsense).

3) That natural immunity following Covid infection offers no protection against future illness (despite numerous studies showing that natural Covid infection protects against all known coronavirus variants for more than 12 months).

4) Calling Covid injections “vaccines,” when they all fail to meet the legal definition of a vaccine.[2]

5) That early treatment with the antivirals Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (used safely and effectively against a variety of infections for over 20 years) is dangerous and ineffective.[3]

The film moves on to emphasize the criminality of Big Pharma, in league with the FDA and CDC (and Biden and Fauci), of continuing to promote Covid vaccines that have already killed nearly 30,000 Americans. Even worse is the enactment of federal, state and corporate mandates (resulting in the firing of unvaccinated employees) when officials know perfectly well that none of the Covid “vaccines” prevent infection or transmission. Several researchers highlight the irony of continuing to inoculate people for a virus (the original Wuhan variant) that doesn’t exist any more.

Part 1 next delves into the longstanding conspiracy by pharmaceutical companies to destroy the careers of doctors and researchers who question vaccine safety. In addition to highlighting numerous Covid vaccine choice doctors and researchers who have been fired and blacklisted, they also the case of British gastroenterologist Dr Andrew Wakefield. The latter had his career destroyed after he published research linking the MMR vaccine to autism. He was subsequently vindicated in 2014, when CDC whistleblower Dr William Thompson revealed the CDC had falsified data in a 2002 study showing a clear link between the MMR and autism in African American boys.

Part 2

The second part begins by questioning the motivation (and possible corruption) of judges who have have refused to overturn US mandates, despite clear evidence (originating from the pharmaceutical companies themselves) that vaccinations fails to prevent workers infected with Covid passing it on to co-workers or clients and customers.

It also compares the plight of Covid whistleblowers to that of Rachel Carson when she took on the chemical industry with her 1962 book Silent Spring. At the time, nearly the entire corporate media dismissed her as “radical,” “disloyal,” “hysterical,” and/or “unscientific.”

The filmmakers also delve into the murky role of “regulatory capture” in the mass distribution and promotion of highly dangerous and clearly ineffective [4] “vaccines.” The latter derives in part from the funding the FDA and CDC receive from pharmaceutical companies (who pay to have their assessed for approval) and in part from the notorious “revolving door” system, whereby compliant FDA and CDC officials typically move into more lucrative careers with pharmaceutical companies.

Finally they examine the failure of the mainstream to question the clearly criminal behavior by Big Pharma and corrupt regulators. It becomes clear the main reason for the massive amount pharmaceutical companies spend on TV and print advertising isn’t to promote their products. With so many news outlets relying on pharmaceutical advertising to survive, Big Pharma’s true motivation is to control content.

I was intrigued to learn the Biden administration has also paid corporate media outlets over $1 billion to promote Covid vaccines.

The film concludes by talking about the Nuremberg Code, which bans the mandatory imposition of experimental treatment on anyone without their consent, and the role of the Covid plandemic in the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset.


[1] Drug companies have been forthright from the outset that the vaccines (allegedly) reduce the severity of Covid illness – that they don’t prevent infection or spread.

[2] See https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/4132

[3] After reviewing more than 60 studies, Dr Tess Lawrie estimate that early treatment with Ivermectin could have prevented 80% of Covid deaths in the US. Government and Big Pharma had to negate the effectiveness of existing treatments to meet the legal requirements for emergency FDA vaccine authorization.

[4] Growing evidence suggests that immune suppression caused by Covid vaccines means that vaccinated patients have more severe Covid infections and higher rates of hospitalization and death. The fact that the (so-called) effectiveness of these vaccines wears off after three months is further evidence of its ineffectiveness. No vaccine in history has every required three monthly administration.

Film can be viewed free at the following link:

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/premiere-uninformed-consent-a-matador-films-picture/

3D Printing: Increasing Profits While Eliminating Jobs?

Printing Out the World

DW (2020)

Film Review

This documentary literally gushes over 3D printing, which in my mind makes great leaps in eliminating both manufacturing and warehouse jobs. Increasingly the wealthy elite refer to large scale job elimination as the Fourth Industrial Revolution or the Great Reset. While aspects of this new technology are both fascinating and exciting (especially for billionaires seeking to increase profits), I find it concerning the film fails to mention the social impact of the mass elimination of jobs.

Recent advances mean that current 3D printers are much faster and less energy intensive than early models. This increases the probability that more manufacturing will return to the industrial North from the Third World, leading to shorter supply chains and eliminating the need for warehouses. Using 3D printing makes it possible to produce spare parts as they are needed, increasing the lifespan of a wide variety of machines. This new technology also has the potential to eliminate overproduction, a traditional bugbear of the capitalist economic system.

The filmmakers visit a major German 3D printer manufacturer and Radius, their US counterpart.

At present 3D printing is used to produce a variety of plastic parts for Airbus, significantly reducing the weight of their aircraft, thereby increasing their fuel efficiency and reducing their carbon emissions. 3D printing is also used to produce soles for Addidas shoes. Although Adidas is headquartered in Germany, the soles (which are printed in Germany) have to be shipped to Asian factories for assembly. 3D printing is also used to produce cellphone cases.

Although most 3D printers use built-up layers of liquified plastic (a major environmental contaminant) in the products they make, it’s also possible to 3D print products out of aluminum and carbon fiber. It’s also possible to 3D print with biodgradable plastic made of cornstarch.

In India, there are projects that recycle the PET from plastic bottles into plastic filaments used to 3D print sung;asses and other produces.