Distinguished doctors and scientists who specialize in COVID-19 vaccine research and treatment participated in the three-hour event.
This is my summary of the second part of the roundtable discussion. You can read the first part here.
Roundtable, part II
David Gortler, Ph.D., former faculty member at Yale School of Pharmacology, recently from the Center for Ethics and Public Policy within the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), told us he was fired for being one of the few persons within the FDA who called out the leadership and asked them to follow their own procedures for evaluating vaccine safety.
Usually, the FDA starts by getting an ingredient list, knowing contents and dosage quantities for any medication before even considering approval. In the case of the COVID-19 vaccines, this rudimentary information was withheld by the manufacturers, and they still maintain ingredients lists as a trade secret.
Del Bigtree showed a short video, a composite of journalists and public officials who stated unequivocally that the COVID-19 vaccines would prevent a vaccinated person from passing the virus to anyone else. But assessing transmission of the virus was not part of the protocol when the vaccines were being tested. The question was not even asked.
Johnson listed some of the officials who were invited to the roundtable to give balance and present their perspectives on the story.
All of them declined to appear or to send a representative. Johnson indicated that this is consistent with his experience in the past. The people who are making COVID-19 policies avoid debating the issues with other scientists.
Dr. Peter McCullough outlined normal procedures for establishing safety monitoring boards and critical event committees, ethics committees and institutional review boards whenever a new drug is released. None of this was done with the COVID-19 vaccines, despite the fact that these vaccines were released to the public with far less testing than any approved product in the past.
David Wiseman, Ph.D. reported on the gap between Pfizer’s vaccine insert, which says there is no data establishing safety for pregnant women, and the CDC’s guarantee that the vaccines are safe for pregnant women in their public promotions. (The vaccine insert was added last summer. For the first 19 months of the vaccines, they were distributed with a large, folded package insert saying only “This page intentionally left blank.”)
Dr. Robert Malone cited a Stanford study demonstrating that the average vaccinated individual gets larger doses of spike protein from the vaccine than the average COVID-19 patient gets from the virus.
Malone added that the mRNA vaccines are made from lipid nanoparticles that require exacting conditions far beyond the normal organic chemistry that is involved in making a drug. There are dozens of sites around the world where the vaccines are being manufactured, and FDA is not inspecting any of them.
How-bad-is-my-batch is a website that compares safety results from different vaccine batches, and there is wide variation by lot number in the number of vaccine injuries reported.
Brianne Dressen, a 42-year-old mother and classroom teacher, had been healthy before volunteering for the AstraZeneca vaccine trials. After vaccination, her immediate symptoms included double vision, tingling and numbness in her arms, followed by paralysis in her left leg the next morning.
She is now unable to work or engage in normal household activities because of nerve damage. Doctors tell her that the damage is progressive. In the reported results of AstraZeneca trials, her case was not even mentioned as a safety concern. This, unfortunately, was typical.
Adverse reactions to the vaccines during the test phase were routinely understated or ignored. A woman in the Moderna trials developed lymphoma (blood cancer), but in Moderna’s write-up, she was listed as fully recovered.
A 12-year-old from the Pfizer trials who has been confined to a wheelchair and feeding tube the rest of her life was coded as a “stomach ache.” Dressen became aware of these cases and many others when she and her husband organized an online support group for the vaccine injured, which quickly grew to 20,000 members.
Dr. Joel Wallscog was an orthopedic surgeon in Madison, Wisconsin before nerve damage from a Moderna shot ended his career. Symptoms include balance problems, dizziness and weakness in both legs. His diagnosis was transverse myelitis, [an injury to the spinal cord that is related to multiple sclerosis].
Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) made a cameo appearance and expressed concern that the government agencies which people trusted to protect them were withholding information and lying outright during the pandemic.
Dr. Kirk Milhoan, a pediatric cardiologist, defined myocarditis as inflammation of the heart muscle. The spike protein manufactured by our bodies in response to vaccination has been found to cause myocarditis. Rates of myocarditis following vaccination are not being measured or reported in this country.
A study from Thailand indicates a rate of 2-3% of adolescent males with myocarditis following vaccination. For college students, the risk of hospitalization after COVID-19 is about 0.002%. The risk of myocarditis from vaccination is about a thousand times higher.
Yet our governments and our universities are demanding that students be vaccinated as a condition of enrollment. Ninety days after vaccination, damage to the heart was still detectable in more than half of those who suffer myocarditis.
Dr. Renata Moon, a pediatrician, had seen only three cases of myocarditis in her 20-year career. Now she sees myocarditis routinely.
Dr. James Thorp is an ob-gyn in St Louis. He reported a “substantial, massive, unprecedented increase in menstrual abnormalities, infertility, miscarriage, fetal death and fetal malformation. We have published many studies over the last two years based on data from VAERS and CDC.”
Lt. Col. Theresa Long, M.D., M.S. listed some of the injuries she has seen personally, including strokes, clotting in the spleen and liver, spinal tumors, brain tumors, sarcoidosis [a once rare condition, involving warts that grow on internal organs], lupus, cognitive impairment, myocarditis, pericarditis, avascular necrosis [dying bone that has been deprived of blood supply] that required hip replacement and a “shocking, pervasive” suppression of the immune system.
Dr. Ryan Cole said that the nanolipid particles that deliver mRNA in the COVID-19 vaccines were designed to bypass the body’s barriers, including cell walls and the blood-brain barrier.
The toxic spike protein goes to the heart, the brain, the reproductive organs and all the most sensitive areas of the body, where it causes inflammation and autoimmunity.
We were told that the vaccine stays in the deltoid muscle of the arm, and this is just wrong. Sen. Johnson then pointed out that “stays in the arm” was not a mistake but a deception. Companies that produced the vaccines had results from animal tests that showed the presence of the spike protein in sensitive areas of the body.
The virus and the vaccine both dose the body with spike protein and the damage compounds. For this reason, COVID-19-recovered people were excluded from the vaccine trials — and yet, the vaccines are now being recommended, even mandated, for people who have recovered from COVID-19.
“In order to prevent future harm, all these vaccines need to be withdrawn from the market. That needs to happen immediately. All the vaccine mandates should be dropped. We need requests for applications and immediate funding for vaccine injury. Centers of excellence across the United States for screening, detection, and diagnosing of vaccine injuries. We need a massive shift in our healthcare system towards managing this large number of vaccine-injured people. What is at stake here is increased risk of death.”
Watch the entire roundtable discussion here: