The corruption of political systems by global corporatists has filtered down to our science, medicine and healthcare systems.
Because science, medicine and politics are three threads woven into the same cloth of public policy, we have to work to fix all three simultaneously.
The corruption of political systems by global corporatists has filtered down to our science, medicine and healthcare systems and must be exposed.
Furthermore, the perversion of science and medicine by corporate interests is expanding its reach; it is pernicious and intractable. Regulatory capture by corporate interests runs rampant throughout our politics, governmental agencies and institutes.
The corporatists have infiltrated all three branches of government, and it is up to us, the people, to take control back. Corporate-public partnerships that have become so trendy have another name, that name is fascism — the political science term for the fusion of the interests of corporations and the state.
Basically, the tension between the interest of the republic and its citizens (which Jefferson felt should be primary), and the financial interests of business and corporations (Hamilton’s ideal) has swung far too far to the interests of corporations and their billionaire owners at the expense of the general population.
The nation and its governing arms (including the entrenched bureaucracy often referred to as the “deep state”) now primarily serve the interests of multinational corporations, their managers and owners, instead of the other way around — serving the people.
The term that best describes this system of government is called inverted totalitarianism. This term was first coined in 2003 by Dr. Sheldon Wolin, a political theorist and writer. Inverted totalitarianism is what the government of the United States has devolved into, as he had warned might happen many years ago in the book “Democracy Incorporated.”
The United States has been co-opted into a managed democracy. This democracy was placed into the hands of oligarchs by bureaucratic imperatives and managerial principles and practices, which have created a creeping form of totalitarianism.
Now we can clearly see the liberties and freedom of this democracy being eroded rapidly just as Wolin predicted.
The ending result is this new form of totalitarianism, that (unlike classical totalitarianism) does not have an authoritarian leader, but instead is run by a non-transparent group of managers and elites who run the country from within. What President Trump might call the “deep state.” Or what Steve Bannon originally called the “Uniparty.”
In effect, our democracy has been turned upside down while being captured by corporate interests that endorse authoritarian policies — hence “inverted totalitarianism.”
The infiltration of this version of fascism has gone so far that even routine aspects of the political sphere are determined by corporate interests.
This was cemented in the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission, a decision that reversed century-old campaign finance restriction laws.
This ruling has enabled corporations and other outside groups to spend unlimited funds on elections.
As a nation, we are once again confronted by a historic conflict that goes back to Jefferson and Hamilton and the founding of this country. Simply stated this is the old issue of whether capitalism is a tool of (representative constitutional) democracy or is democracy a tool of capitalism.
Will democracy control capitalism or will capitalism control democracy? Two of our founding fathers, Jefferson and Hamilton, represent the two sides of the coin in this tension, and awareness of this dynamic conflict was built into our constitution.
In theory, the people, through democratic representation, are empowered to elect leaders and pass laws, but when corporate financial interests become too powerful they are able to overthrow this relationship and capture political control by exerting financial power and influence over the political process.
In the 21st Century, a new threat to democracy and the people’s rule has emerged. That is the party of Davos, the alliance of transnational corporations, and their representatives as the leaders and managers of global governance.
This has yielded an emerging system of inverted totalitarianism on a global scale.
Transnational corporate rule is not limited by national rules and regulations, and its tentacles are everywhere.
At the national level, we see its effects on the judicial, legislative and executive branches.
On the international level, the money and power from the transnational organizations have bought off entities like the World Health Organization.
The nominal head and coordinating body of this globalized effort to control the world through capitalism has become the World Economic Forum, whose primary belief is that national boundaries are less important than global connectivity and management through corporatism.
Here we are today. In many ways, the hidden head of this unelected corporatist government structure is now the leadership of the World Economic Forum which meets annually in Davos Switzerland, where the heads of corporations and the apex predator financial firms come together to decide the governing decisions of the world (including the practice of medicine), and politicians and other influencers travel as supplicants akin to courtiers approaching an emperor or a pope.
So, if inverted totalitarianism is smashed together with the development of such a global corporatist ruling elite, the question becomes who is running the United States?
With the largest brush strokes possible, it comes down to the World Economic Forum and the party of Davos.
And what we have seen develop, worldwide, during the time of COVID is gross overreach, managerial incompetence and a reflexive tendency toward authoritarianism that has resulted in an appalling loss of life, liberty and ability to pursue happiness here in America.
What somehow must be accomplished, if we wish to retain the U.S. Constitutional form of government and the freedoms guaranteed by the founding documents, is to return to the primacy of the individual, “that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”
It is people that should control the levers of government — we must return the balance between the Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian ideals.
Capitalism is in the service of representative democracy, not the other way around. That is what this great nation was founded on.
Resistance is almost the only way that this can be fought. It has to be organized — funding and the effort must have professional organizers.
Resistance has begun, largely in church communities and self-assembling social media aggregates, with people organizing to form autonomous groups outside of the formal power structures which include the two main political parties — both of whom have been significantly captured by corporate interests (the Uniparty).