This is nuts, Moderna & Pfizer intentionally lost the clinical trial control group testing vaccine efficacy and safety

Conservative Treehouse | August 6, 2021

This is not just scientific madness, it appears to be very intentional and purposeful.

The Moderna and Pfizer vaccine tests were conducted, as customary, with a control group; a group within the trial who were given a placebo and not the test vaccine. However, during the trial -and after the untested vaccines were given emergency use authorization – the vaccine companies conducting the trial decided to break protocol and notify the control group they were not vaccinated. Almost all the control group were then given the vaccine.

Purposefully dissolving the placebo group violates the scientific purpose to test whether the vaccine has any efficacy; any actual benefit and/or safety issues. Without a control group there is nothing to compare the vaccinated group against. According to NPR, the doctors lost the control group in the Johnson County Clinicial Trial (Lexena, Kansas) on purpose:

(Via NPR) […] “Dr. Carlos Fierro, who runs the study there, says every participant was called back after the Food and Drug Administration authorized the vaccine.

“During that visit we discussed the options, which included staying in the study without the vaccine,” he says, “and amazingly there were people — a couple of people — who chose that.”

He suspects those individuals got spooked by rumors about the vaccine. But everybody else who had the placebo shot went ahead and got the actual vaccine. So now Fierro has essentially no comparison group left for the ongoing study. “It’s a loss from a scientific standpoint, but given the circumstances I think it’s the right thing to do,” he says.

People signing up for these studies were not promised special treatment, but once the FDA authorized the vaccines, their developers decided to offer the shots. (read more)

Just so we are clear, the final FDA authorization and approval for the vaccines are based on the outcome of these trials. As noted in the example above, the control group was intentionally lost under the auspices of “the right thing to do”, so there is no way for the efficacy, effectiveness or safety of the vaccine itself to be measured.



17 thoughts on “This is nuts, Moderna & Pfizer intentionally lost the clinical trial control group testing vaccine efficacy and safety

  1. Pingback: This is nuts, Moderna & Pfizer intentionally lost the clinical trial control group testing vaccine efficacy and safety — The Most Revolutionary Act | FREEDOM MINDS FOR THE AMERICAN REPUBLICS

  2. Not so nuts. I’ve been waiting for this kind of thing to happen. They have the data someplace—you can bet on that.

    Remember that these people lie a lot. Just because they say they lost it doesn’t mean they did.

    I’ve seen all sorts of crazy things happen in my day.

    These guys

    Deception [Updated]

    simply stopped documenting allegations of MD sexual abuse back in the late 1970s. The director of the CDC comes from their now parent company which one of the three founders of PIH now holds a position on a Clinton Foundation organization. Details on positions held are in here:

    Who Now Runs The Centers for Disease Control [CDC] in the USA?

    I have to clarify a position, but the information is all there. I was so dumbfounded when I connected those dots I walked away from the computer before I really should have.

    I’ve had medical records edited by Lahey—a big name in Massachusetts. The original records documented a lesion on my cervical spinal cord that they “disappeared” with their edit. They refused me access to the original.

    I’ve seen all sorts of crazy stuff happening during my 7 decades.

    Maybe what should happen is when they lose the data they lose their license to use the product.

    And now that I think of it, that safety data should be nestled somewhere in CDC databases, but the CDC has one immune to FOIA requests—the VSD—because of the way it was set up through subcontracting.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I was just thinking of this yesterday. I was thinking about how by vaccinating more than 50% they undermined the potential for legitimate studies by not having controls. But, then I recalled that they did have the clinical trial people and I didn’t know that they were dissolved. There’s also this convenient for them fact that Pfizer data kept in China:
    I know there are clinical trial people in other countries, I wonder if they were dissolved.

    Liked by 1 person

    • There are two things about those who are pushing these faux vaccines. They lie through their teeth and they have no sense of proportion. They remind me of the Holocaust storytellers!!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Thanks! To me the number one reason not to take the vax is to boycott these companies, who I have always thought were behind the pandemic. Patents are only good for 20 years and vaccine twice a year for an ever mutating virus is a big cash cow for them.


      • Some or all Swiss cantons did trials of the different vaccines to choose which one they would buy. I don’t know if those trials are still ongoing. Because of the influence of the Steiner schools and movement many Swiss are anti-vaccination. They won’t be force vaccinating the general public though I read someplace that they are forcing some workers to be vaccinated. There are really the two Switzerlands IMO – the independent mountain Swiss of 1291 and the lowland big Pharma-Banksters.


    • A bigger problem lies in the now accepted protocol of not using saline as a placebo. I didn’t check this one, but I assume they used some nice toxic product that was checked against some other nice toxic product [and so on] and found that their toxic shot killed or maimed or sickened about as many people as their toxic placebo.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Pingback: FDA Approval Of Pfizer Vaccine Is A Farce As Control-Placebo Group Was 'Dissolved' Back In February - Dave Levine Online

  5. The decision to halt the placebo group was made on ethical grounds. When early phases of the trial clearly showed that the vaccine was effective, researchers concluded it would be unethical to withhold the treatment from the placebo group. Withholding such treatment would violate the physician’s oath to do no harm.

    Imagine that your spouse is in the placebo group. Pfizer determines from early phases of the trial that their vaccine is 95% effective is preventing COVID-19. But they withhold this information from your spouse, who subsequently contracts COVID-19 and dies from it.

    Would you seriously argue that Pfizer did the ethically right thing in withholding that information from your spouse and continuing to give her a placebo, when the trial had already proven that they had an effective vaccine?


  6. This is certainly the spin the vaccine makers are putting out, Sabrina, along with their cheerleaders in the corporate media. This overlooks the reality that the task Operation Warpspeed gave them was to produce a safe and effective vaccine that prevented patients from becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 or transmitting it. At the end of 2020, when it became apparent that none of the vaccines marketed in the Western World significantly reduced infection or transmission, instead of scrapping the project and attempting to produce a vaccine that did reduce infection and transmission, they (and their friends at the FDA and CDC) opted to move the goal posts and foist a vaccine on the public that appeared to reduce the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. I say appeared to reduce severity, only because (as the British Medical Journal has pointed out) they refused to release their data for independent review. With the appearance of the Delta variant (which many virologists with experience with coronaviruses predicted), it’s now questionable if the Pfizer vaccine at least (the main vaccine used in Israel) significantly reduces the risk of hospitalization and death.

    In dealing with the question of reducing hospitalization and death, there are several safe and effective treatment options that are peer reviewed. These include Ivermectin (which has been shown to reduce death rates by 85% in 49 peer reviewed studies), hydroxychloquine and monoclonal antibodies. Sadly this information is being suppressed by the Western media, though Ivermectin is being widely used in third world countries.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.