By Chris Lonsdale | 21st Century Wire | July 14, 2021
Since COVID-19 hit the scene at the beginning of 2020, one of the key elements driving the fear around this disease is that there appeared to be no cure. And, for people who got infected with COVID-19, the guidance coming from major global institutions such as the NIH (US National Institutes of Health) and the CDC (US Centres for Disease Control) was basically “do nothing, stay home, and when you turn blue go to the hospital.” This public health policy prescription was usually followed by the qualifying caveat, “this is our only approach until a vaccine arrives.”
This, clearly, has terrified people all around the world. For the majority of the world’s population the belief has been that catching COVID-19 is a veritable death sentence. Which leads us to an important question. How would things change if there were, in fact, effective treatments for COVID-19?
I have just come out of a fascinating 90-minute press conference and Zoom call, delivered by the Malaysian Alliance for Effective COVID Control (MAECC). This was very much a “good news” presentation. The main message? There are very effective treatments for COVID-19.
The essence of the discussion in the MAECC session focused on the drug Ivermectin. The Doctors found it necessary to do a press conference and public presentation because the widespread use of Ivermectin in Malaysia is currently illegal. A doctor prescribing Ivermectin for his COVID-19 patients was recently raided by police!
Malaysian doctors are not doing leading edge research here, but simply trying to care for their patients by working to get a proven treatment officially accepted for use in Malaysia. Ivermectin has already been used very successfully in many places around the world where media hysteria did not get it banned from the shelves. Mexico has used it to great effect, as did Peru. Over the last few weeks, reports coming out of India are demonstrating massive benefits from Ivermectin.
There is already a 97% decline in cases in New Delhi, India. Indeed, four other Indian states that are using Ivermectin now report decreases in cases by 60% to 95%. However, other states that have blocked the use of Ivermectin have increases in cases by several hundred percent – the exponential explosion that everyone is terrified of!
As The Desert Review says in their report, “It is a clear refutation of the WHO, FDA, NIH, and CDC’s policies of ‘wait at home until you turn blue’ before you get treatment.”
Before you buy into the criticism that these are only “observational studies” and haven’t been tested by large scale, randomized control trials approved by the WHO, CDC, NIH, FDA etc. it’s important to realize that the only type of studies that are apparently good enough for such institutions these days are those which are so large and complex that only multi-national pharmaceutical companies are able to run and fund them.
That said, you should know that 56 studies on Ivermectin, 17 of them being Randomized Control Trials, have clearly demonstrated very positive effects from Ivermectin. A site doing real-time meta-analysis of all the Ivermectin studies as they get published summarizes the results as follows: “100% of the 17 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) for early treatment and prophylaxis report positive effects, with an estimated improvement of 73% and 83% respectively”.
They also make the point that “The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 56 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 2 trillion (p = 0.00000000000041).” You can check this information yourself directly on their site (Source: https://ivmmeta.com).
Another effective protocol for prophylaxis and early treatment of COVID-19 is Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with Zinc. As of this writing, 248 trials of HCQ used for treating COVID-19 have been completed, by 3,972 scientists, with 378,812 patients. We can see 66% improvement in 26 early treatment trials, 75% improvement in 11 early treatment mortality results, and 24% improvement in 35 randomized controlled trials. These results are publicly available on a database that is tracking all HCQ studies to date. You can see those studies here at https://c19hcq.com.
There are also a number of other effective treatments for COVID-19 that we don’t have space for here.
What’s important to understand is that these effective treatments have been used since mid-2020. Which raises a very important point. If these treatments are so effective, why haven’t we heard about them? Why aren’t they being used everywhere? It appears that, for some reason, information about the effectiveness of these treatments is being suppressed.
For instance, “Fact checkers” will tell you that HCQ or Ivermectin aren’t authorized by major institutions like the FDA, CDC, or WHO (as if such organizations are supposed to set and police policy rather than simply providing guidance). They will also try to discount any positive results using ad hominem attacks and smears, such as pointing out that a person using one of these treatments may have at some time in the past, voiced “anti-vaccine sentiments” (whatever that may be). You can see an example here: https://factcheck.afp.com/ivermectin-and-hydroxychloroquine-are-not-proven-covid-19-treatments
The censorship extends to Social Media. A whole list of front-line doctors who have successfully used some of these treatments have had their accounts removed from Social Media platforms, simply because information they provided about their successes was deemed “contrary to guidelines from the WHO” by the various Big Tech platforms. I have personally witnessed the de-platforming of literally dozens of highly respected, professional, front line doctors and researchers.
De-platforming is not the only concern. It appears that in the attempts to discredit effective treatments for COVID-19, anything goes. A study which came out in The Lancet mid-2020 supposedly showing that HCQ was dangerous was subsequently withdrawn due to the study being fraudulent.
Sadly, this withdrawal happened only after the damage was done, and HCQ had been successfully kicked to the curb in many places around the world – even up to the point that in some jurisdictions doctors could be jailed for prescribing it!
You may ask: “How did these studies that were apparently designed to falsify the effects of a widely used drug, pass peer review in the world’s premier medical science journals – The Lancet as well as The New England Journal of Medicine ?” The details of this sordid tale can be found here:
If one digs, it appears that the main reason that we have not heard of these effective treatments is that the WHO and the CDC and other major institutions do not approve of the use of any alternative treatments, unless these are being tested in a clinical trial (which it seems only they can approve of). For instance, the US National Institutes for Health (NIH) guidelines state: “The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) recommends against the use of any drugs for SARS-CoV-2 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), except in a clinical trial (AIII).” See the PDF document here: https://files.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/guidelines/covid19treatmentguidelines.pdf
This is indeed strange, especially in the middle of a pandemic. One would expect that, in order to save patient lives, doctors would look for and try medicines that might possibly work, as long as there were no safety issues. When clearly there is evidence of no-harm, and increasingly powerful evidence that certain treatments can save lives, it would be highly unethical for Doctors NOT to start using such treatments. Doctors use medicines for purposes other than those listed on the label all the time!
Since Ivermectin and HCQ are both on the WHO list of essential medicines and have been so for a long time – decades in the case of HCQ – the world knows about the safety and dosage of these medicines. As an example, since 1992, Ivermectin has only been linked to 16 deaths, whereas deaths linked to the COVID-19 vaccines are now in the thousands (information from the Uppsala Drug Monitoring Centre run by the WHO (https://www.who-umc.org) via Prof Paul Marik, Chief of Critical Care & Pulmonary Medicine, EVM, USA).
Clearly, something appears very much out of balance here. There ARE effective treatments for COVID-19, yet the institutions that we rely on for medical guidance appear to be ignoring, or even suppressing these treatments – even though they are known to be safe after many decades of use. Despite their known safety, neither Ivermectin nor HCQ have been able to obtain even an EAU (Emergency Use Authorization)!
At the same time, new creations that have only had very limited testing, and for which the safety cannot be known in such a short period of time, are approved for emergency use.
The world economy is now in dire straits, with entire populations having been essentially under house arrest for the better part of 18 months. People continue to die from (or with) COVID-19 without treatments being available. And we are now seeing important examples of breakout infections in people who have already been vaccinated against COVID-19. As Reuters reported just a few days ago, “Hundreds of vaccinated Indonesian health workers get COVID-19, dozens in hospital”. This is just one many similar news stories reporting the very same phenomenon.
According to the pharmaceutical manufacturers themselves, the current range of emergency use vaccines do not actually provide immunity and only “reduce severe symptoms” of COVID-19. While this issue has yet to be fully resolved, many in the mainstream are still claiming that these vaccines will “inoculate” the recipient against the novel coronavirus. Therefore, these jabs should rightly be categorised as a type of treatment against the disease of COVID-19, and not a vaccine against the said pathogen, the SARSCoV2 coronavirus.
It goes without saying that the wide availability of cheap and effective drug treatments for COVID would severely undermine the widely touted mainstream claim that mass-vaccinations are the only solution to slowing down or ‘defeating’ a supposed global pandemic.
Clearly, effective treatments are absolutely required at this point. The good news is that there are such treatments available.
With effective treatments in hand, the global COVID-19 situation could end in as little as a few weeks. The world CAN return to normal. Sadly, there seem to be forces at work blocking such an outcome.
We need to ask: why are these effective treatments not being allowed in so many places? Why is information about these treatments being suppressed?
Hi Stuart.. Dr. Judy Mikovits claims that with a fortified immune system, we will develop an IMMUNITY to the SPIKE PROTEIN SHEDDING from the tax.. Any thoughts?
that was supposed to read VAX not TAX… lol… (nothing will make us immune to taxes).. lol
Deb, based on my limited knowledge of the immune system, I think she is right – the body can remove the spike protein eventually. The big danger is that the immune system will overreact and create a chronic autoimmune disease in the process. I disagree with her comment about pine needles. The naturopaths here in New Plymouth are recommending pine needles, star anise or comfrey because they contain shikimin acid because they help break up the tiny blood clots that cause vascular damage.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I see your point… If pine needle tea is the only way to obtain Shikimic acid, it makes perfect sense to me…
Please clarify the distinction between Prophylactic use & Treatment. See Bret Weinstein channel for full description.
On Sat, 17 Jul 2021, 08:50 The Most Revolutionary Act, wrote:
> stuartbramhall posted: ” By Chris Lonsdale | 21st Century Wire | July 14, > 2021 Since COVID-19 hit the scene at the beginning of 2020, one of the key > elements driving the fear around this disease is that there appeared to be > no cure. And, for people who got infected with ” >
I am pretty sure this post is for Stuart but I can certainly explain ‘prophylactic use’… I take Ivermectin 5 tabs at once, every Sunday AM (have been using it for 8 months).. This is for prophylactic use because it PREVENTS COVID infection.. Just like a condom/prophylactic prevents pregnancy – Ivermectin can prevent COVID.. The treatment protocol for Ivermectin is handled differently..
I have been exposed to COVID 4 times that I know of but who knows.. It appears to be working..
Deb is right, yogazeal. Lots of doctors who work with Covid patients are taking Ivermectin prophylactically to keep from becoming ill. The Indian government was dispensing it free in a lot of areas prior to their vaccine rollout.
How were you able to obtain ivermectin? My doctor won’t prescribe it.
I have a private Dr. who will prescribe it. The Flacc & frontline Drs will prescribe also.
You’ll have to Google FLACC & there is a list of Drs. It works miracles.
Thanks for the info, Julia. I get a lot of queries about Ivermectin.
Tucker Carlson Today – Dr. Peter McCullough – YouTube
Tucker Carlson and Dr. Peter McCullough discuss early treatment for Covid-19.
Great link, con. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Independent Citizens.
Pingback: Now We Know: They Lied to Us About Covid Immunity! | al fin next level
Pingback: Truth: The Instrument of Our Freedom – The NeoConservative Christian Right
Pingback: Open Letter to Doctor of Northeast Ohio – Lobbyists for Citizens
I attempted to present the above arguments to my Doctor for already safe, approved treatments for covid-19 and was fast tracked out the surgery very quickly. It seems not fully tested vaccines with more than a few short term and long term effects including deaths are the only settled answer. Borders and shut downs in some states here in Australia are finally openning up but the reason for others in keeping them closed is the fear of hospital overcrowding and lack of medical staff??
I was treated as a fool for not embracing the vaccines and my sensible argument for Doctors to be allowed to prescribe tested treatments to alleviate the hospital crisis, fell on deaf ears.
I’ve had exactly the same problem here in New Zealand, Carol. It’s odd that all Western governments (except for Sweden and a few others) are reading from the same script. I reckon you might want to make contact with Dr Thomas Borody in Sydney or Dr Greg Hunt in Melbourne to see if there are any doctors in your area who are looking at early treatments: https://thebfd.co.nz/2021/09/06/australian-health-minister-quietly-backs-invermectin/
And what about this treatment. It sounds reliable and convincing how and why some people are reacting badly to the virus.
Great link, Tikki Wikki. Thanks.
God has done it by using Doctor Akhidenor to get me cure from Pemphigus Disease, after a long time looking for a cure, I met this Doctor and asked help from him, he was able to prepare me a herbal soap to bath and a herbal liquid medicine to drink, I used this medicines for totally one full month, now I am fully cured totally and all my body is cleaned up and I have done my test, my medical doctor told me that I am cured totally and my result comes out negative, I am very happy for what Doctor Akhidenor has done for me, he save my life and everything, I will advise you to contact this herbal doctor on his email firstname.lastname@example.org, his whatsapp number is +2348021312463, contact this Doctor now and ask for help.
Thanks for the referral, Grace.
This destroys the Spike protein and heals Long Covid. Needs to be done more than once for stability but from the first time you will see the results. It’s a combination of EFT and prenatal biology https://needinfo666.wixsite.com/covidtreatment