21st Century Wire | May 24, 2021
Since the pandemic crisis began in early 2020, government and public health officials have been adamant that any difficult measures taken were all being done in order to ‘control the spread of the virus’ or ‘stop the disease.’ Thus, a litany of so-called non-pharmaceutical interventions, and also pharmaceutical interventions – were deemed by the consensus to be essential measures in fighting the spread of what was being characterized as an asymptomatic disease.
Over a year later, a few industrious ‘public health’ mavens have summoned the courage to actually test this fundamental assumption. Recently in the UK, officials have staged and monitored nine large-scale events, including an FA Cup final football match, and the Brit Awards – both of which were exempt from the usual COVID rules. The results of this test should be hailed as good news, but for those heavily invested in the narrative, it’s nothing short of a meltdown: little to no coronavirus “cases” turned up.
Officials managed to scrape together just 15 alleged “cases” or “infections” (deemed as such merely from a single ‘positive test’) out of some 60,000 total attendees.
The result of this experiment has dealt a crushing blow to the central myth upon which the entire COVID-19 ‘global pandemic’ crisis has been built – namely the myth of the asymptomatic spread, and the much-maligned notorious “super-spreader” events.
Sky News UK reports…
Nine large-scale events were staged as part of the government’s plan to allow for the return of big crowds this summer. Those who attended were exempt from certain coronavirus rules, such as the rule-of-six.
The government confirmed to Sky News that 15 COVID cases had been recorded out of nearly 60,000 people who attended the events, which “is in line with the broader population”.
Latest figures show the rate of people testing positive for COVID in the UK is 22 infections per 100,000 people.
The pilot events included three football matches at Wembley Stadium – the FA Cup final which was attended by 21,000 supporters, an FA Cup semi-final and the Carabao Cup final.
IMAGE: Animated graphic from NPR’s debunked April 2020 propaganda article entitled, “What We Know About The Silent Spreaders Of COVID-19.”
Combine this latest UK admission with the recent backtracking by Dr. Anthony Fauci and the US Center for Disease Control CDC on masks and asymptomatic transmissions, and it’s clear that officials will have no choice now but to back-off supporting the nonscience-based myth of the asymptomatic spreader or “silent spreaders,” and it’s not difficult to see how problematic this widely held assumption is now becoming, with many media doctors and public health officials now facing challenges over what can only be described as a collective propaganda effort deployed by government, media and medical industry over the last 14 months.
The peer-reviewed literature is also clear, with large-scale studies conducted, including at the supposed epicenter of the pandemic in Wuhan, China – all of which showed no evidence of alleged asymptomatic spreading of the ‘novel’ coronavirus. See their results here, here, and here.
Of course, none of this should surprise any honest doctor or real scientist. We’ve always known that any disease requires symptoms first. But somehow, common sense has been completely abandoned during the Covid crisis.
Of all the widely-held assumptions and hysteria surrounding the COVID crisis, none has been more pivotal than the myth of the ‘asymptomatic spread’ in ballasting every single unprecedented ‘health intervention’ policy including:
- Social Distancing
- Mass Testing
- Reliance on non-diagnostic PCR and Lateral Flow tests
- Track and Trace bio surveillance
- Lockdowns
- Quarantining the healthy
- Masks
- Border Closures
- Business Closures
- School Closures
- Mass Vaccinations
- Vaccine Passports
It’s astonishing to consider that every single one of these emergency measures have been predicated on the widely-held, nonscientific myth of the asymptomatic spread.
[…]
“any disease requires symptoms first”
Does this mean I can only be infected by someone who shows symptoms?
LikeLike
This is what controlled trials seem to demonstrate, Aunty. People who are asymptomatic do not appear to shed virus.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It says: “Among the 19 of 21 persons with COVID-19 who were symptomatic, symptoms developed an average of 2.3 days after collection of the test-positive sample.”
So I think, the question is, whether someone stays asymptomatic, isn’t it? Isn’t it very important that someone who starts showing symptoms, does stay away from people. Do people on average do this, if they show only minor symptoms?
LikeLike
https://losalamosreporter.com/2020/12/15/lanl-answering-the-what-if-questions-on-covid-interventions-with-median/
The questions and answers in this article show that there are people who honestly try to answer these difficult questions! For instance how soon do you know that an asymptomatic person is eventually not going to show any symptoms and able to infect others? And how careful is that person going to be if some symptoms do show up?
What about contact tracing? Is is of value in preventing further infections?
LikeLike
The problem with the claims made in the article is they are basing the diagnosis of Covid on the PCR test, which has been shown to be an invalid method of diagnosing Covid. See https://www.theportugalnews.com/news/2020-11-27/covid-pcr-test-reliability-doubtful-portugal-judges/56962
And since most jurisdictions use the PCR for contract tracing, this is also useless in clinically diagnosing people with Covid. There are so many false positive results (especially above 25 cycles) that for the first time in history, influenza totally disappeared in the northern hemisphere during the winter of 2020-2021. All patients who would normally be diagnosed with influenza were diagnosed with Covid because they had a positive PCR.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It says: How Did a Disease With no Symptoms Take Over the World?
At the end of this very interesting article it says:
“The author, who wishes to remain anonymous, is a senior research scientist at a pharmaceutical company.”
LikeLike
I have another question: Is it not fair to say that every person that is asymptomatic must at some stage have been in contact with a person that showed symptoms? So within a certain time frame it should be possible to trace that person with symptoms? So I think during this epidemic even people with minor symptoms should take these minor symptoms very seriously so as not to infect others in case these symptoms are not just cold symptoms but result from having this dreadful Coronavirus! How can we stop the Coronavirus from spreading? Very simple: Everybody with any symptoms at all must straightaway self isolate until all symptoms disappear!
LikeLike
That makes a lot of sense, too, Aunty. For years, I’ve been arguing that people with flu and cold symptoms should also self isolate, as those can be very nasty illnesses, especially in elderly people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Citizens.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Rangitikei Environmental Health Watch.
LikeLike
Pingback: The Myth of the ‘Asymptomatic Spreader’ Dealt Another Blow This Week — Aletho News | The Most Revolutionary Act | Wirral In It Together
Pre-symptomatic is a whole other animal than asymptomatic .
Asymptomatic people will have dead viral particles for which a high cycle PCR test will deem positive.
Asymptomatic people are those who eradicate the virus quickly and cleanly hence no symptoms.
Do these people shed live viral particles in droves? Absolutely not .
Pre-symptomatic people most definitely do with increasing viral shedding as the virus progresses symptoms show with abandon.
LikeLike
Interesting. Can you refer me to the studies that show this? It seems to contradict the findings cited in this article.
LikeLike