Calling out the CIA faux left.
What neither Maté nor Dore understand is that 9/11 exposed Amy Goodman and the entire fake “left” foundation-funded media complex. They were now on the side of the CIA and censoring out dissenters. People like Chomsky set the tone and–generally–no one who disagreed was allowed to challenge their orthodoxy.
DN did allow on a couple of 9/11 skeptics:
The theologian David Ray Griffin was allowed on but set up with an adversarial attack dog, which he was not informed about beforehand. It was a gotcha hit piece to discredit Griffin on the air, not to examine the massive amount of information he had written about. The headline says it all: “Debate,” which he didn’t know he was there to debate in the first place.
The Israeli angle was explored at DN one time as well, when they had on Christopher Ketcham six years after the attacks. The spin wasn’t…
View original post 24 more words