There will Have to be an audit as clear, unequivocal, categorical proof that the US Presidential Election result was not legitimate is released.

Statistical election data compiled by Peter Navarro, an American economist and author. He serves in the Trump administration as the Assistant to the President, Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, and the national Defense Production Act policy coordinator. See https://floridianpress.com/2021/01/navarro-releases-volume-two-on-election-irregularities-the-art-of-the-steal/

The Daily Trumpet

The likes of CNN cannot argue against this election data, as they are the same numbers CNN use.

Credit to Peter Navarro.

View original post

8 thoughts on “There will Have to be an audit as clear, unequivocal, categorical proof that the US Presidential Election result was not legitimate is released.

  1. Pingback: There will Have to be an audit as clear, unequivocal, categorical proof that the US Presidential Election result was not legitimate is released. — The Most Revolutionary Act | FREEDOM MINDS FOR THE AMERICAN REPUBLICS

  2. “Whatever you do,” cried Brer Rabbit, “Don’t throw me into the briar patch”

    It’s a smart Old Fox (as CiC) in charge of the Hen House Old Guard up on The Hill *wink*

    Like

  3. Why on earth have you reblogged that rubbish? It’s just a list of numbers. There not a shred of evidence provided for any of them.

    Not one of the what is it? (hundred +?) Trump court challenges has bee upheld, not even where the judges were Trump appointees.

    The reason there is no evidence is that the Trump claims are utterly untrue and fraudulent in themselves. Actually, the GOP stole hundreds of thousands of votes in some States like Georgia and Florida through illegal purges of the voter rolls, blatant discrimination (like removing early voting drop boxes in Democratic voting areas, and reducing the number of polling places in Democratic areas. In Florida a poll tax was put on former prisoners: you could vote only if every last cent of debt to the State was repaid including large penalties. The courts ordered the 198000 illegally purged voters in Georgia (there were more but those are the files that went through the courts) to be reinstated. They weren’t. The State defied the court order. The vote mobilisation teams wrote to all 198000 and would have followed up on many of those so not all the votes were lost, but it involved enormous effort.

    Please refrain from reinforcing baseless and fraudulent claims. I’m sure you are much better than that.

    Cheers

    Lowell

    Like

  4. Lowell, I don’t know if you followed the link to Navarro’s complete reports (the source of this table), but I found a lot in both reports quite concerning and very consistent with a pattern in 2000 and 2004 that fraudulently gave the presidency to George W Bush and fraudulently stole the primary vote from Bernie Sanders in 2016 and 2020.

    In past elections, researchers have relied on voter exit polls to detect fraud. With so many postal ballots cast this year, this wasn’t possible.

    I was even more concerned about a video I saw of a hearing in the Georgia State Legislature where evidence was presented of Trump votes actually going down over time in certain counties (embedded below).

    I think there is enough merit to Navarro’s claims that they should continue to be investigated – in conjunction with the voter purging that you mention.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.