9-11: Anatomy of a Great Deception

9-11: Anatomy of a Great Deception

RT (2017)

Film Review

The first 9-11 Truth documentary I’ve seen on RT, this film takes a unique approach to explaining why 9-11 was an inside job. It’s based on independent filmmaker Dennis Hooper’s 2014 documentary 9/11: Anatomy of a Great Deception.

Hooper was always troubled by the Secret Service failure to evacuate President Bush from the school he was visiting in Florida – despite the knowledge that the US was under attack by foreign terrorists with hijacked airplanes.

Like many of us, he was also troubled by the collapse of Building 7. Located more than a football field away from the Twin Towers, its collapse couldn’t be explained by structural damage or fires fueled by jet fuel. Adding to Hooper’s concerns was the failure of the official 9/11 Commission Report  to make any mention of Building 7 – despite persistent demands by 9/11 Families for a “scientific” investigation into its collapse.

The film proceeds to lay out an extremely lucid explanation, based mainly on the detailed work of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, why structural damage (from planes) and jet-fueled fires couldn’t possibly cause the collapse of three buildings at the World Trade Center.

For Hooper, the most significant evidence is the pools of molten steel first responders discovered in the building rubble. Steel melts at 3,000 degrees F, while kerosene (ie jet fuel) fires produce a maximum temperature of 1,800 degrees F.

Making use of extensive footage produced by the 9-11 Truth movement, Hooper walks viewers through extensive evidence documented that all three World Trade Center buildings could only have been brought down by controlled demolition.*

Moreover the discovery of military grade nanothermite (which is only produced at the Los Alamos National Laboratory) leaves absolutely no doubt that people at the highest levels of government were complicit in bringing down the WTC.

Clearly a postscript to the original film, the last 29 minutes consists of a a strange interview in which Hooper blames the 9-11 attacks on a 2,000-year-old conspiracy orchestrated by Satan and the Forces of Evil.


*Controlled demolition is the tearing down or razing of man made structures via the detonation of carefully timed explosive charges.

8 thoughts on “9-11: Anatomy of a Great Deception

  1. Its hard to understand why people think the collapse of WTC7 was part of the “Crime of the Century”. Nobody was killed in WTC7. All the occupants had been evacuated hours earlier.

    A similar thing applies to the collapse of the Twin Towers. Almost every one of the 2999 deaths that happened on 11 September happened long before the Towers came down, or were brought down.

    Sure, it would have been an unauthorised demolition, if that has happened, and did not have any permits from NYC. Yes. some firefighters were killed there. But almost all the victims of this crime were long dead: in Washington, or in Philadelphia, or killed by the plane crashes at the Twin Towers, or died by burning, suffocation or suicide in the hour that followed the crashes.

    How were these thousands of people killed? By those who flew the planes, obviously.

    Were they Mossad? Were they USAF or CIA pilots? Or were they jihadists?

    Interested to hear your response….

    Like

  2. There are a number of conflicting theories about who, ultimately, was responsible for 9-11. Nearly all implicate Bush administration insiders, including Dick Cheney and Marvin Bush and a variety of private intelligence contractors, some of which were owned by Israeli and Saudi Arabia nationals. All we know for sure is that we’re being lied to about what happened.

    Like

  3. Obviously it is conceivable that the 9/11 attacks were organised by the USA or its allies (such as Israel) and the blame successfully placed on al Qaeda.

    And if it was organised by the USA or Israel, then it does not really matter whether those who hijacked the planes were USAF, or CIA, or Mossad, or gullible jihadists secretly recruited (the “patsies” theory) to do it.

    What is puzzling, though, is that so many critics focus on the buildings’ collapse, as if that was a major crime. It wasn’t. The buildings would have been demolished anyway, they were burnt out.

    The real criminals were those flying the planes, and they had no way of knowing what might happen to the buildings in the following hours. Taking the focus away from the murderers is no way to uncover any lies that were told!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.