The fire in Paradise, California: From natural disaster to social catastrophe

The basic obstacle to addressing the social causes of catastrophes like that in Northern California is the capitalist system, which subordinates all of economic life to the interests of the corporate and financial elite. There is not a single social problem, including the need for massive investment in social infrastructure, that can be solved without a frontal attack on the wealth of the ruling elite.

The US state of California has been devastated by the most destructive and deadliest wildfires in the state’s history. While wildfires, like hurricanes, are rooted in natural causes, the horrific consequences are the product of corporate malfeasance and government neglect.

The most devastating impact had been in Northern California, where the Camp Fire largely destroyed the rural town of Paradise, population 26,000. The official death toll now stands at 81. Hundreds remain missing, with many likely to have perished in the blaze. Search and rescue teams continue to sift through the debris for remains from a fire that burned hot enough in parts to destroy bone. Millions of people face unknown health consequences from widespread air pollution.

With little to no warning, families had to flee the rapidly advancing flames only to find roads blocked by overwhelming traffic. Some managed to escape on foot, others died in their cars as the flames overtook them, while many never made it out of their homes. The lucky ones have still lost almost everything, forced to live as domestic refugees in crowded and unhealthy shelters or makeshift tent cities.

A map of utility companies regional monopolies courtesy of the state Energy Commission

The victims in Paradise were older and poorer than the rest of California. The median age was 50, and the median household income $20,000 a year less than for the state as a whole. As far as the government response has been concerned, their lives and continued survival are a matter of indifference. Aside from a handful of shelters—where a norovirus outbreak sent at least 25 survivors to the hospital—and a pittance in FEMA supplies, those fleeing Paradise have had to rely on friends, family and charity.

The Camp Fire joins the long list of disasters over the past few years, including Hurricanes Michael (60 dead), Florence (53 dead) and Maria (3,057 dead) in the US. It comes four months after the Attica wildfires in Greece, which killed 99. In each case, natural events have been compounded by crumbling infrastructure and inadequate emergency planning to create social catastrophes.

The response of government officials, Democrat and Republican, has been to downplay the extent of the disaster while seeking to deflect attention from those responsible. On Sunday, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke absurdly declared that unnamed “environmental radicals” are to blame for preventing good forest management. This followed Trump’s tour of the state with Democratic Party officials, which was characterized by empty platitudes and mutual declarations of support.

What are the real factors responsible for the devastation?

First, there is the role of the energy companies, whose aging infrastructure is known to have caused many fires.

At the heart of California’s energy infrastructure is a group of three investor-owned utilities: Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Edison (SCE) and San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) with monopolies in their respective regions. Combined, these utilities have been responsible for over 2,000 wildfires in California since the state began requiring them to report incidents in 2014. PG&E alone is responsible for over 1,500 fires, including 16 major fires in 2017. Eleven of those sixteen were determined to involve PG&E negligence, and the company faces potentially $17 billion in liability for the lives and buildings lost that year.

The precise cause of the Camp Fire is still being investigated, but it began next to Poe Dam, 10 miles east of Paradise, only minutes after PG&E reported a power failure on its lines there. Firefighters initially responding to the blaze reported downed powerlines.

In a document filed with the Security and Exchange commission last week, PG&E stated that if it was found responsible for the fire, the damages would exceed its insurance coverage and threaten its financial stability. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) immediately responded by issuing a statement Friday that it would limit damages victims could recover from PG&E to protect the company’s “financial status,” under the provisions of the newly adopted state law supported by Governor Jerry Brown. In short, even if the company is found responsible through negligence, the state regulators will shift liability for the damages from PG&E’s shareholders onto the victims.

Second, there is the impact of government neglect and the failure to take basic precautionary measures, despite ample warning. Paradise has long been known to be in danger. In 2002, a powerful wind storm toppled five PG&E steel towers at Poe Dam, sparking a fire that threatened the town. The incident commander at the time told the Chico Enterprise-Record that it was “a miracle so many homes were saved, so few homes lost and no major injuries or fatalities.”

In 2008, the Humboldt Fire threatened Paradise from the southwest, cutting off all but one rural road out. Luckily, the town was spared. A government report from the time noted that the city had only one viable evacuation route that was only designed to carry 1,200 cars an hour.

Despite all the predictions and near misses, the Democratic Party-controlled state government left the problem unsolved. When the fire came this month, no systematic citywide evacuation notice was given. The government issued no emergency broadcasts, and cell phone alerts were only sent to those who had opted-in, about 30 percent of the city. Many residents trying to escape found the roads clogged, with no planned escape routes. . .

Source: The fire in Paradise, California: From natural disaster to social catastrophe

2 thoughts on “The fire in Paradise, California: From natural disaster to social catastrophe

  1. What I would like to know is why did whites, even poor whites, think that gentrification would not rear its ugly head and impact them? To the so-called ‘elites’, poor is poor and it is quite apparent that ‘poor white’ to them means just about as much as ‘poor Black’ to them. And I would bet the farm that there was not one Black person to be found living in what was formerly, “Paradise.” Even the ‘poor whites’ were still able to ‘segregate’ themselves in an ‘all poor white city’ and that still speaks volumes. But now that they are homeless, where is the support? Because on every single screen, I cannot help but see that supposedly, hundreds of thousands of dollars has been raised to assist them by both MSN and the Red Cross and yet the news out of that bedraggled homeless tent city formed by those made homeless by the wildfires is anything but good. I see no sign that hundreds of thousands of donated money has made it into the hands of those who are still sitting somewhere wondering what they are going to do. I’ve read that the norovirus is running rampant throughout the tent city and who knows what other illnesses and diseases they will contract especially seeing as how in many homeless tent cities all across America, typhus and hookworm are problematic.

    We were made to think of our situation as an “us vs. them” when in reality, we are all in deep shit if we are not on billionaires row.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Your first question, Shelby, is an interesting one. My general answer would be that the US education system does its level best to keep poor white people dumb and uninformed. My overall experience is that African Americans tend to be much better informed, not only as to power operations within the US, but as to US imperialism and mistreatment of other countries. I think white people are deliberately sheltered from a lot of stuff African Americans are forced to confront the moment they start school. Call it street sense if you want.

    Nearly 40 years ago I had a psychiatric practice in Chico – which is about 25 minutes from Paradise. It was the first time I had encountered true rural poverty, which was comparable to what I had read about in Appalachia. Most of the land had been gobbled up by rich (white) rice farmers,

    The question you ask about where all the donated money is going is far more sinister. I assume it has been swallowed up by the thirsty bureaucracy that runs the non-profit industrial complex.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.