Barbarians Led by Bill Gates: Microsoft from the Inside
By Jennifer Edstrom and Marlin Eller
Henry Holt (1998)
Book Review
Can be downloaded from from Open Library
Barbarians Led by Bill Gates, co-authored by former Microsoft programmer Marlin Eller, is mainly about Gates’ mercurial and inconsistent management style. While highly unflattering to Gates, Barbarians simultaneously refutes Justice Depart claims that Microsoft deliberately tried to squash competitors by stealing their innovations. The authors make out it was all just a coincidence – that Gates was too disorganized to carry out such a conspiracy. I don’t buy it.
Eller was one of the original programmers at Microsoft in 1982 when the company had only two hundred employers. They had more than 20,000 when he left. The programmer was principally involved in the development of Windows, the graphic interface Microsoft copied from VisiOn and the Apple Macintosh. The launch of Windows ultimately enabled Microsoft to monopolize the software market (competitors’ software wouldn’t run on Windows).
As Ellers describes it, the birth of Windows was a long painful saga, plagued by Gates’ mismanagement and numerous blind alleys costing the company hundreds of million. Microsoft had no systematic quality control over Windows. They seem to have mainly relied on customers to inform them of bugs and security flaws post release.
Eller repeatedly depicts Gates ordering his programmers to reverse engineer software created by other companies. Thus I find it hard to believe it was pure coincidence that Microsoft put Netscape out of business by creating Internet Explorer (which they copied from Netscape) – especially when Internet Explorer team left a giant “E” on Netscape’s front lawn the night before they launched Internet Explorer 4.0. Attached was a card that read
“Good people should feel so BAD! Best wishes – the Internet Explorer team.”
The book also details Microsoft’s longstanding legal problems, including numbers copyright infringement lawsuits and a longstanding battle with the Department of Justice over unfair competition and violation of anti-monopoly laws.***
The reader comes away with the sense that Microsoft’s only unique innovation was MS-DOS* and the BASIC programming language Gates created enabling computers to talk to one another. I’m inclined to agree with Justice Department claims that he used his wealth and monopoly power to pressure manufacturers to load Windows onto new computers. This, in turn, squeezed out competitors who designed software for other operating systems.
*Shortly before their 1999 acquisition by AOL in 1999, Netscape created the nonprofit Mozilla Foundation. The foundation, in turn, rewrote the source code for Netscape Navigator. The latter would be used to power Mozilla’s open source Firefox browser. Gates stepped down as Microsoft CEO in 2000 and as chairman of the board in 2014.
**DOS (short for disk operating system) is an acronym for several computer operating systems that are operated by using the command line. MS-DOS dominated the IBM PC compatible market between 1981 and 1995, or until about 2000 including the partially MS-DOS-based Microsoft Windows.
***Microsoft’s battle with the Department of Justice is ongoing.
Looks like, I will have to read this from the open library. Even MS-DOS was bought from the its creater for a pittance. Bill lied to IBM he had an Operating System to use with the PC. He (Microsoft) had to desperately obtain an OS, MS-DOS was what they bought! So even that innovation was a lie!
I recall one innovation: FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt). It was used to undermine the launch marketing of competitor products.
So a proven monopolistic liar, now pushes vaccine as safe and effective and GMOs as safe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, I had no idea Gates didn’t even invent DOS. The book leads you to believe he did. What a pathetic little leech. The book does mention the psychological games he played to undermine competitors.
LikeLike
I echo the comment above.
Gates is a eugenics lover, as well as a liar and cheat! Thus his success as a corporate PIG!
LikeLike
I understand he has share holdings in Monsanto – as well as a few drug companies – so he’s clearly promoting his financial interests as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No doubt.
But many people are still not aware of how twisted Gates and his wife are in many other ways.
LikeLike
I do not trust billionaires, even the ones who give the better part of their fortune to charity. However, if Mr. Gates came from good old Texas oil family money then he would not have lost half of his wealth thorough official shakedown. He may meet a fate similar to Howard Hughes with government shills manipulating, destroying him and fleecing him of a good deal of his fortune.
LikeLike
I lived in Seattle when Microsoft was just getting started. His father was a partner in Preston, Gates and Ellis, a law firm responsible for issuing all Seattle’s municipal bonds (as well as those of other cities). They were notorious for arm bending the Seattle City Council to issue the bonds in the first place.
Even the business press credits an extremely creative IPO (stock offering) – which Gates senior helped set up – for Bill junior’s wealth. Definitely not his creative genius.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Satu Insan – Malaysia and commented:
The reader comes away with the sense that Microsoft’s only unique innovation was MS-DOS* and the BASIC programming language Gates created enabling computers to talk to one another. I’m inclined to agree with Justice Department claims that he used his wealth and monopoly power to pressure manufacturers to load Windows onto new computers. This, in turn, squeezed out competitors who designed software for other operating systems.
LikeLike
Thanks for reblogging, merahza. As ebolainfo mentions above, apparently Gates didn’t even create DOS – he bought it from someone else.
LikeLike
http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/did-bill-gates-steal-the-heart-of-dos
SCP (Seattle Computer Products) hired programmer Tim Paterson… It called this system QDOS, for “Quick and Dirty Operating System.” Gates bought the rights to QDOS for $75 000 and hired Paterson to modify it into MS-DOS; that’s what he licensed to IBM for its PC as PC-DOS.
http://gizmodo.com/5825184/bill-gates-spent-the-best-money-of-his-life-30-years-ago-today
Rather than writing a new one from the ground up, it turned to Seattle Computer Products and its existing 86-DOS (aka QDOS), and bought a non-exclusive license for $25,000. The next Spring, in May 1981, it hired away the program’s author, programmer Tim Paterson. And then, on July 27, it paid another $50,000 for all rights. A month later, it was shipping on IBM personal computers, and eventually turned Bill Gates and Paul Allen into two of the world’s richest men.
LikeLike
Amazing. Thanks for the link.
LikeLike
http://www.secretsofthefed.com/bill-gates-to-introduce-remote-controlled-sterilization-microchips-for-women/ not related but same idea to dominate and control.
LikeLike
Pingback: Steve Jobs and Bill Gates: Inside the Rivalry | The Most Revolutionary Act