Unstoppable: The Emerging Left-Right Alliance to Dismantle the Corporate State.
Ralph Nader (2014)
A long time consumer advocate, Nader has spent most of his career battling the corporate takeover of government and US society. Although most analysts place him to the left of the Democratic Party, he frequently allies himself with libertarians and populist conservatives in specific campaigns. He now maintains the only way to restore accountable Constitutional government is by forming what he calls right-left convergences.
Traditional Labels Meaningless
Nader begins by defining “right” and “left,” as both have ceased to have any real meaning. He devotes an entire chapter to dispelling the common myths people from opposite ends of the political spectrum have about each other. He begins by discussing the philosophical architects responsible for the basic principles that underpin conservatism and libertarianism, with special emphasis on Adam Smith, Ludvig Van Mises, Frank Meyer, Russell Kirk and Peter Viereck. He goes on to trace links between contemporary conservatism and the 19th century populist movement in which farmers fought big banks and big railroads. This movement, commonly referred to as the “populist” or “decentralist” movement, would eventually evolve into Goldwater and Reagan conservatism. Nader maintains that many contemporary Republicans who call themselves “conservative” are really corporatists or corporate statists – working primarily for the benefit of the corporations who put them into office.
The US Left represents too many different tendencies – liberals, progressives, socialist, anarchists – to agree on a single overarching political philosophy.
Although Nader doesn’t mention it, many prominent figures identified with the so-called Non-Communist Left have been discredited by accepting major funding from CIA pass-through foundations.1
Issues Ripe for Collaboration and Potential Obstacles
Nader identifies 25 potential issues that are ripe for collaboration between existing left and right-leaning movements (see below).2
He feels the biggest potential obstacle to potential is the knee-jerk ideological reaction of major party activists. It’s often hard to move Democratic Party loyalists past the tired knee-jerk reaction that conservatives are too narrow-minded, dogmatic and self-interested to be worthwhile coalition partners. Meanwhile many conservatives have the mistaken belief that all leftists are covert socialists who are only interested in big government, more welfare spending, more business regulation, more debt and and higher taxes.
Nader bemoans the tendency of ideologues from both ends of the political spectrum to get so focused in dogma and abstractions that they can’t lose sight of the constitutional crisis in front of them.
This is partly why left-right convergences tend to me more effective at the local level, where people are already shoulder-to-shoulder confronting the practicalities they face everyday. This is certainly consistent with what Susan Clark and Woden Teachout describe in Slow Democracy, their book on local direct democracy. It also reflects the the experience of the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF), which unites activists across the political spectrum in outlawing fracking, toxic sludge, factory farms and water bottling plants.
Examples of Successful Left-Right Collaboration
Unstoppable goes on to provide numerous examples of high profile right-left alignments in Congress (see below). 3
The main value of the book, in my view, is to remind us of the political power of strange bedfellow alliances and to discourage knee-jerk reactions to collaborating with people of different ideological persuasions. Since Unstoppable went to print, a left-right congressional convergence prevented Obama from going to war against Syria, and left-right convergences in Washington and Oregon passed ballot initiatives legalizing marijuana.
1Frances Stonor Saunders discusses this at length in her 1999 book Who Paid the Piper? The CIA and the Cultural Cold War.
2Personally, I think Nader’s list is too long. I myself would prioritize 6, 12, 14 and 22, as I already see evidence of left-right collaboration on these specific issues:
- Requiring annual auditing of the defense budget and that ALL government budgets (including the CIA and NSA) be disclosed.
- Ending corporate welfare and bailouts.
- Promoting efficiency in government contracting and government spending.
- Adjusting the minimum wage to inflation.
- Introducing specific tax reform as well as pushing to regain uncollected taxes.
- Breaking up the “Too Big to Fail” banks.
- Expanding contributions to charity, using these funds to increase jobs and draw on available “dead money” (i.e. recycle wealth from millionaires and billionaires).
- Legislating to allow taxpayers the standing to sue all government and “immune” corporations.
- Expanding direct democracy by introducing ballot initiatives in the states that don’t have them and simplifying recall processes.
- Pushing community self-reliance.
- Clearing away obstacles to a competitive electoral process.
- Restoring civil liberties.
- Enhance civic skills and experience for students.
- Ending unconstitutional wars and enforcing Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, which gives Congress the exclusive authority to declare war.
- Revising trade agreements to protect US sovereignty and ending fast track approval for treaties.
- Protecting children from commericialism and the physical and mental harm it causes.
- Ending corporate personhood.
- Controlling more of the commons than we already own.
- Getting tough on corporate crime.
- Ramping up investor power by strengthening investor-protection laws.
- Opposing the patenting of life forms.
- Ending the ineffective war on drugs.
- Pushing for environmentalism.
- Reforming health care.
- Creating convergent institutions.
3 Among many others:
• The left-right coalition that stopped the Clinch River Breeder Reactor in 1983
• The left-right coalition that passed the False Claims Amendment Act in 1986 to protect whistleblowers who uncovered fraud in government contracts. The passage of the McCain (R)–Feingold (D) Act to reform campaign financing in 2003.
• The left-right coalition Ron Paul formed with sympathetic Democrats to introduce a bill to legalize industrial hemp in 2005.
• The bill Ron Wyden (D) and Rand Paul (R) introduced to legalize industrial hemp in 2013.
• The bill Ron Wyden (D) and Lisa Murkowski introducing requiring the reporting of donations over $1,000 to any group engaged in federal political activity.
Reblogged this on Awakestate.
I believe if I’m not mistaken that discourse and collaboration were the two things our founding fathers understood created a healthy republic. It the backbone of any free society.
You’re right. Nader mentions that in his book. The process of writing the Declaration of Independence and Constitution involved lengthy negotiation between men with diametrically opposed world views.
Thanks for following my blog by the way. I’m investigating yours as we are conversing. Why did you chose New Zealand? If you have noticed I believe as you do just take a very different approach. Believe some people who think some of our thinking is to radical can see things better when a different type of light is shed on the true problem.
I chose New Zealand because I worked as a psychiatrist here for 8 years – after I first came in 2002. It’s the easiest country for an American psychiatrist to get credentialed to practice in their specialty. Believe it or not, I don’t really consider myself that radical. I would really give anything to go back to the way my parents lived before the corporate elite began their campaign to turn everyone from citizens into consumers.