CIA Whistleblower Incarcerated for 12 Months Over 911

extreme prejudice

Former CIA asset Susan Lindauer describes how the Department of Homeland Security locked her up on a military base for 12 months and tried to detain her indefinitely without a hearing and drug her with Haldol and other psychotropic medication. Why? Because she possesses extensive documentary evidence that the CIA had foreknowledge of the 9-11 attacks as early as February 2001. This, along with other important documents related to the Lockerbie bombing and the US wars on Iraq and Libya, are published as an appendix in her 2010 book Extreme Prejudice.

Prior to her arrest, Lindauer was the chief CIA asset in charge of Iraqi and Libyan back-channel communications. She was under indictment for five years. Eventually her late partner’s exhaustive efforts to publicize her case paid off and she was granted a hearing – and released.

Towards the end of her talk, she describes her late partner’s conversation with Amy Goodman, host of Democracy Now! Amy’s flimsy excuses for refusing to cover the story, during a period when Lindauer was being held incommunicado at Caswell Air Force Base, aren’t at all surprising. Especially when you have a look at the CIA-funded foundations that finance Democracy Now! See Does the CIA Fund Both the Right and the Left?

5 thoughts on “CIA Whistleblower Incarcerated for 12 Months Over 911

    • Well, yes and no. Yes, we’re not being told the truth but it seems the Twin Towers were blown up by mistake due to faulty intelligence. I stayed up last night watching this 4 hour video by former Soviet intelligence agent Dimitri Khalezov. This is the only plausible explanation I’ve seen for how the steel supports, concrete etc being totally pulverized and the steel remaining molten for 6 weeks afterwards:


    • Fascinating. To the best of my reckoning, Bin Laden was a classic entrepreneur who built roads and entered into multimillion dollar deals with the Bush family like the rest of his family. I think the CIA recruited him because of his charisma and money connections – and then decided he was a convenient scapegoat when the Pentagon wanted to ramp up military spending again.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.